LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook

Trump’s Iran Policy Is More about Rollback than Nukes

by Joshua Landis The renewed US offensive against Iran is not so much about its...

Message no image

Published on January 27th, 2012 | by Jasmin Ramsey


Iran Hawk Watch

In response to a worrying trend in U.S. politics, Lobe Log publishes Iran Hawk Watch every Friday. Our posts highlight militaristic commentary and confrontational policy recommendations about Iran from a variety of sources including news articles, think tanks and pundits.

*This week’s must-read is Trevor Thrall’s “Support for Whacking Iran: Who Needs Propaganda?” in the National Interest.

Mainstream Media and Pundits:

Matthew Kroenig in the Christian Science Monitor: The online publication of the Georgetown assistant professor’s  “Time to Attack Iran” in Foreign Affairs was met with several critical responses that demolished Kroenig’s pro-war argument, most notably by Stephen Walt and Paul Pillar. But Kroenig’s claims continue to be referenced, mainly by right-wing news publications, or in the case of the Christian Science Monitor, with an entire article slot given to Kroenig to rehash his original piece into “5 reasons to attack Iran”.

Past and Present U.S. Officials and Politicians:

Tom Ridge in Fox News: George W. Bush’s Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge says that the U.S. should “publicly support” the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) and “regime change in Iran”. Ridge erroneously implies that the MEK, which has killed U.S. and Iranian citizens and is a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization, is Iran’s “democratic opposition”. But as many journalists and analysts have pointed out, the group’s leadership has no support among the vast majority of Iranians—pro-regime or not. Ridge is nevertheless one of several former U.S. officials who continue to make misleading claims about the group, which has spent millions through its affiliates on speaking fees for it well-known advocators. In response to the barrage of pieces like this one that were published at the peak of the MEK’s 2011 campaigning, I produced this compilation of articles exposing it for what it is (most of which were written by people opposed to the current Iranian government).

Side note: Last year, Georgetown law professor David Cole wondered out loud whether Ridge and other former officials committed a federal crime by endorsing a U.S.-designated terrorist organization.

KT McFarland in Fox News: Earlier this month a slight drama ensued over a changing Washington Post headline that initially contained the words “Iran” and “regime collapse” in it. The Post had published an article that made it appear like the Obama administration was pursuing regime change in Iran through sanctions instead of a “dual-track approach”. Hours after the article’s publication, the Post revised it three times to disavow that assumption. Whatever went on behind closed doors at the Post over that article is a mystery, but one thing is certain, Iranian regime change is still being endorsed in certain influential circles, particularly among Republicans. Case in point: here is Kathleen Troia ‘KT’ McFarland, who worked in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations and now serves on the advisory board of the hawkish Foundation for Defense of Democracies, advising President Obama to use “Option C” on Iran, described by her as

…using Western resolve, Arab cooperation and Western technological advances to stress the Iranian economy to the point that it collapses and the Iranian people bring about regime change on their own.

James Woolsey on WorldNetDaily Radio: Eli Clifton of Think Progress reports that former CIA director and pro-Israel hawk James Woolsey (who has also vocally supported the Iranian exile terrorist group, the Mujahideen-e Khalq), told a right wing radio station that “anything that is related to the thugs that are oppressing the Iranian people” were “fair game” for attacks if Iran moves to close the Strait of Hormuz”. See Woolsey’s expanded pro-war argument from last week here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

One Response to Iran Hawk Watch

Show Comments >

  1. avatar Greg says:

    The only way to avoid war with Iran , is supporting all Iranian opposition groups. Lack of support for people on Theran’s street couple years ago was the biggest mistake by Obama adminstrtion has made toward Iran policy.
    MeK despite of Iranian regims propaganda is the main and the major opposition existing against Tehran, we should not eliminate them from our options because of the claim made by Tehran about killing Americans 40 years ago.
    Tom Ridge, the first homeland security is absolutely right re MeK.

About the Author


Jasmin Ramsey is an Iranian-born journalist based in Washington, DC.

Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!