Pompeo: The Real Threat to U.S. National Security

Mike Pompeo (lev radin via Shutterstock)

by Lawrence Wilkerson

I know something about U.S. secretaries of state lying to the American people and the international community. I assisted one of them to do so on February 5, 2003 before the United Nations Security Council. Yes, Colin Powell and I had been spoon-fed the lies by a too-compliant intelligence community leadership and a Machiavellian vice president, but we delivered those lies with vigor. For that, I at least am ashamed. I will let the former secretary of state speak for himself.

But our crimes in that regard pale before the current lies of the present secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, because he, unlike Powell and me at the time, knows that he is lying. Here, for example, is what he said on February 13, at the Sheraton Hotel in Warsaw, speaking on the record to PBS’s Judy Woodruff:

If you want to know who’s caused the humanitarian crisis in Yemen, you need look no further than the Islamic Republic of Iran. Judy, for example, how many dollars has Iran provided for humanitarian assistance in Yemen? I can tell you. Do you know?

Anyone even cursorily keeping up with the most brutal war in the Middle East knows without any doubt who caused and continues to cause the overwhelming majority of the suffering, the starvation, the unprecedented exposure to cholera, and the utter brutality of what’s going on in Yemen. The states that started and have been waging this war since 2015, horribly and brutally, are Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

In the last year, both kingdoms have spent billions to change that stark reality, but they have failed. Emaciated babies, intentionally destroyed foodstocks, just-as-intentionally contaminated water sources, dead children in school buses, food assistance halted at the sea line while people starve, it all cannot be hidden by even the very best Saudi-hired U.S. propaganda firms.  The truth is so enormous that even their expertise, oiled by Saudi billions, cannot completely hide it.

Iran, on the other hand, simply responded to a target of opportunity. When the Saudi-led war commenced, Iran saw a relatively inexpensive chance to get involved more deeply in yet another catastrophic strategic failure of its archenemy across the Persian Gulf, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and its brutal ruler, Mohammad bin Salman. So, with very limited and low-cost support, Iran began backing the Houthi rebel group against whom the Saudis and the UAE were waging war—and losing, a clear fact that the Pentagon seems utterly oblivious to.

Because ignominiously, the United States supports the Saudi/UAE coalition. So pernicious is that support that recent revelations have included photographs of U.S.-made weapons, furnished to the Saudis, now in the hands of al Qaeda fighters. Pompeo’s remarks were made to justify that U.S. support. Like the lies rendered on February 5, 2003 with regard to Iraq, they just might pave the path—indeed are intended to pave the path—to yet another war in that region, this one with Iran.

But this wasn’t the end of Pompeo’s strategic nonsense. Here is what he said later when asked on February 14 by Roxana Saberi of CBS News why the U.S. approach to North Korea seemed to contradict its approach to Iran:

We’ve made very clear that these situations are very different. We take each of them where we find them. North Korea today has weapons, nuclear weapons, capable of reaching the United States of America…

So, Pompeo just signaled quite dramatically to the hardliners in Tehran that they need to get a nuclear weapon or two before the U.S. will treat them with some fairness and in a way that, let’s face it, any other state would want to be treated—with some respect. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the agreement Trump and Pompeo have violated, restrained Iran from developing such a nuclear weapon. Now, the Trump-Pompeo-Bolton team wants to compel Iran to develop one.

Pompeo is, to be sure, a yes-man par excellence, and much of the censure should be heaped on his boss, Donald Trump. But Pompeo’s dramatic incompetence as the number-one U.S. diplomat is killing this country, session by session, moment by moment, inept word by inept word.

That abject incompetence is also murdering U.S. alliances, alienating U.S. friends, and giving aid and comfort to Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping—so much so that Pompeo himself might just constitute the greatest threat to U.S. security.

Lawrence Wilkerson is the Distinguished Visiting Professor of Government and Public Policy at the College of William and Mary. He was chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell from 2002-2005. He served 31 years in the US Army.

Guest Contributor

Articles by guest writers.



  1. Iran was never “ready to develop the bomb” not even under Ahmadinejad who in fact repeated Iran’s many compromise offers to cease 20% enrichment if Iran could only once again buy the fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor, before the UNGA. While it is claimed falsely in the US media that Ahmadinejad restarted enrichment, in fact the decision was reached under Khatami before Ahmadinejads election, after the EU3 cheated Iran in the Paris Agreement talks with their infamous “empty box in pretty wrapping” offer, under U.S. pressure (read Oborne and Morrissons book Dangerous Delusions) The IAEA asked Iran to delay the restart to allow them to reinstall monitoring equipment. In fact in the 2009 elections Mousavi criticised Ahmadinejad for being too soft in nuclear talks. Under Khatami, Iran had again suspended enrichment for close to 3 years, with nothing to show for it. Jack Straw later said that was one reason Ahmadinejad was elected. Iran has long made BETTER compromise offers than the JCPOA that the US ignored in favor of maintaining the “nuclear threat” pretext for regime chsnge. No evidence of any nuclear weapons program was ever found in Iran, the dispute was never really about that, and IrAnian presidents don’t make nuclear policy on their own anyway.

  2. In fact Iran had only one chance to take its nuclear program all the way to the finish line but it missed the opportunity due to the religious decree made against the move by Khomaini and later on by Khamenehie. Many experts in nuclear technology encouraged Iran to finish the work at the end of Iraqi Attack in 1988 predicting that Iran future negotiations will depend on it and she will be negotiating from the position of strength. Had Iran done it the JCPOA would’ve had a different and better outcome for Iran. Additionally Obama would’ve been able to get the JCPOA approved by the Senate under those conditions and Trump would’ve been Trumped! Well Iran missed the opportunity and for certain there are seeking other options quietly and internally.
    Pompeo has already confirmed the prediction of the experts by saying the negotiation with NK are completely on the different level than with Iran because NK is a nuclear power and Iran is not!

  3. We would all like to know which experts told Khameni iotherwise but in any case it may be true that Iran’s stated decision to never seem nukes may have undermined their negotiating position, see how the US talks to N Korea but not Iran. On the other hand since nukes were always a pretext and Bolton has stated he’d like to urge Iran to withdraw from the NPT, it may have also provided just the excuse they see k. In any case this is a discussion about alternate realities.

  4. It is also very doubtful Iran could have made nukes in 1988 since it weren’t even enriching uranium

  5. At the end of the imposed war in 1988 Iran slogan became “it should never happen again”. The decision came out of the those internall discussions as to how to proceed. Of course the main question that had to be answered was how far they had to go in order to having their actions match the slogan. Of course it took them a decade or longer to work their way through the process of implementing their decision. Much efforts were made NOT to identity the people involved publicly in order to protect them. Sadly we all know what happened when a few of those people were identified by the opponents of the project.

Comments are closed.