Yemen War Challenges Saudi Moral Authority

Anti-war protest in London (Alisdare Hickson via Flickr)

By James M. Dorsey

Saudi conduct of its ill-fated war in Yemen coupled with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s alignment with the Trump administration and Israel, and his often coercive approach to diplomatic relations, has opened the door to challenges of the kingdom’s moral leadership of the Sunni Muslim world, a legitimizing pillar of the ruling Al Saud family’s grip on power.

The cracks in Saudi legitimacy are being fueled by the escalating humanitarian crisis in Yemen, described by the United Nations and aid organizations as the world’s worst since World War Two; shocking civilian deaths as the result of attacks by the Saudi-led coalition; electoral successes by populist leaders in countries like Malaysia, Turkey and Pakistan; and the kingdom’s inability to impose its will on countries like Qatar, Jordan, Lebanon, Kuwait and Oman.

An attack this week on a bus in the heartland of Iranian-backed Houthi rebels that killed at least 43 people, including 29 children returning from a summer camp, dealt a significant body blow to Saudi moral authority.

The coalition said it would investigate the attack that has sparked international outrage.

The attack was but the latest of multiple incidents in which weddings, funerals and hospitals have been hit by coalition forces in a war that has gone badly wrong and demonstrates Saudi military ineptitude despite the fact that the kingdom’s armed forces operate some of the world’s most sophisticated weaponry, according to military sources.

Trump reversed a decision by his predecessor, Barack Obama, to halt the sale of air-dropped and precision-guided munitions until it had better trained Saudi forces in their targeting and use of the weapons. An Obama official said at the time that there were “systemic, endemic” problems in Saudi targeting.

“Malaysia and other Muslim nations can no longer look up to the Saudis like we used to. They can no longer command our respect and provide leadership. The Saudis have abandoned the Palestinians, just like the Egyptians. The Saudis have moved much closer to Israel who are suppressing and killing the Palestinians,” said Raja Kamarul Bahrin Shah Raja Ahmad, a member of Malaysia’s upper house of parliament and the head of the ruling Pakatan Harapan (Alliance of Hope) coalition in the Malaysian state of Terengganu.

“Perhaps Malaysia under the leadership of Mahathir Mohamad should take the lead again in speaking up for the oppressed Muslims of the world. It is about time Malaysia again show the leadership that was once so much admired and respected worldwide,” Bahrin added.

Malaysia has sought to distance itself from Saudi Arabia since the return to power in May of Mahathir, whose past Islamist rhetoric and stark anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish statements propelled him to prominence in the Islamic world.

Malaysia has in recent weeks withdrawn troops from the 41-nation, Saudi-sponsored Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC) and closed the Saudi-backed King Salman Centre for International Peace (KSCIP) in Kuala Lumpur. Mahathir’s defense minister, Mohamad Sabu, long before taking office this year, was already highly critical of Saudi Arabia.

In anticipation of investigations into allegations of corruption against former prime minister Najib Razak and his recent indictment, Seri Mohd Shukri Abdull, Mahathir’s newly appointed anti-corruption czar, noted barely a week after the May election that “we have had difficulties dealing with Arab countries (such as) Qatar, Saudi Arabia, (and the) UAE.”

Speaking to Al Jazeera last month, Mahathir said that “we are disappointed that Saudi Arabia has not denied that the money was given by Saudi,” referring to $681 million in Saudi funds that were allegedly gifted to Razak.

Malaysia is but the latest Sunni Muslim nation to either challenge Saudi Arabia or at least refuse to kowtow to the kingdom’s foreign policy as it relates to its bitter rivalry with Iran; Prince Mohammed’s tacit backing of US President Donald J. Trump’s staunch support of Israel and pressure on Palestinians; its 14-month old economic and diplomatic boycott of Qatar in cooperation with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Qatar; and the war in Yemen.

Like Mahathir in the past, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, despite his evolving autocracy, has emerged as an Islamist populist counter pole, his credibility enhanced by his escalating disputes with the United States, his often emotional support for the Palestinians, and opposition to moves by Trump like his recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Erdogan’s Turkey this week became the latest target of  Trump’s wielding of trade and economic sanctions as a means of bullying countries into submitting to his demands. Trump doubled metals tariffs on Turkey after earlier sanctioning two senior Turkish ministers in an effort to force Erdogan to release American evangelist Andrew Brunson.

Brunson has been detained in Turkey for the past two years on charges of having been involved in the failed 2016 military coup against Erdogan and seeking to convert Turkish Kurds to Christianity.

Erdogan has in recent years consistently thought to thwart Saudi policy in the region by positioning himself as the leader of a Muslim world opposed to Trump’s Israel-Palestine approach and a de facto Arab alliance with Israel, maintaining close ties to Iran and defying US sanctions against the Islamic republic, supporting Qatar, and expanding Turkish influence in the Horn of Africa in competition with the UAE, Saudi Arabia’s closest regional ally.

Erdogan has portrayed Prince Mohammed’s vow to return Saudi Arabia to an unidentified form of ‘moderate Islam’ as adopting a Western concept.

“Islam cannot be either ‘moderate’ or ‘not moderate.’ Islam can only be one thing. Recently the concept of ‘moderate Islam’ has received attention. But the patent of this concept originated in the West. Perhaps, the person voicing this concept thinks it belongs to him. No, it does not belong to you. They are now trying to pump up this idea again. What they really want to do is weaken Islam … We don’t want people to learn about religion from foreign facts,” Erdogan said.

Echoing former US president George W. Bush’s assertion of an axis of evil, Prince Mohammed charged in March that Turkey was part of a triangle of evil that included Iran and Islamist groups. The crown prince accused Turkey of trying to reinstate the Islamic Caliphate, abolished nearly a century ago when the Ottoman empire collapsed.

Similarly, Pakistan’s prime minister-in-waiting appeared to be charting his own course by saying that he wants to improve relations with Iran and mediate an end to the debilitating Saudi-Iranian rivalry despite the fact that the kingdom has so far ruled out a negotiated resolution and backs US efforts to isolate the Islamic republic.

In a bow to Saudi Arabia, Jordan has backed the kingdom in its row with Canada over criticism of Riyadh’s human rights record and refrained from appointing a new ambassador to Iran, but has stood its ground in supporting Palestinian rejection of US peace efforts.

Similarly, Lebanese prime minister Saad Hariri has reversed his resignation initially announced in Riyadh last year under alleged duress while Oman and Kuwait, alarmed by the Saudi-UAE campaign against Qatar, have sought to chart a middle course that keeps them out of the firing line of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi.

For the time being, Saudi Arabia is likely to successfully fend off challenges to its leadership of the Muslim world.

However, responding viscerally to criticism like in the case of non-Muslim Canada or, more importantly, two years ago to Muslim leaders who excluded Wahhabism and Salafism, the religious worldview that underpins the Al Sauds’ rule, from their definition of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaah or the Sunni people, is unlikely to cut ice in the longer term.

Reprinted, with permission, from The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog.

James Dorsey

Dr. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, an adjunct senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and co-director of the University of Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture.



  1. Talk of moral leadership or even sensitiveity, is presently completely quaint. Those in power have no morality; those with moral sensitivity, have no power.

    Arguments from morality have a 100% discount.

    Trump and the US have no moral authority. (‘Gulf 1 on’, if you can’t guess)
    May and the conservatives in the UK have no moral authority. austerity, Brexit and much else.

    The Saudis have no moral authority – merely the cudgel of virulently repressive Wahhabism.

    And so on. ‘The meek shall inherit the Earth?’ It’s tempting to say, ‘those who remain of the weak will inherit what’s left of the Earth.’ Cute, but wrong. Those who remain of the strong, will grab the ruins and enslave the stunned survivors. Naomi Klein’s ‘shock doctrine writ large. That’s been the historical pattern; it’s we who’ve lived from (say) 1950 to now, who’ve been living in an anomalous time. Which we were brought up to see as the inevitable continuing normal. It isn’t.

    It requires far more, and far more effective, hard work to counter.

    Any criticism – of say the US for its wild inequality, or devastation of the Middle East, or the conservtive government in the UK’s blundering on regardless of cost to the citizenry, with Breixt, or Israel for the Palestinian”s ethnic cleansing, or Russia, or … the list is long. – is simply completely ignored, or laughed at.

    the vast majority of humans are at least averagely decent people with a moderately positive regard for others. These are not the people in power; and perverse incentives to strive for that power, guarantee those in power are unlikely to be replaced any time soon.

  2. It is among the endangered type ‘family-run corporation’ systems of country governance which is loved, advised and propelled by US. Simply because they spend their money as they like. So expecting from both to observe anything other than their relation is nonsense.

  3. we see all over the world USA influencing many nations by coups, proxi wars, false flag operations, election meddling and attack on sovereign countries. Usa regime is de facto a fascist regime, or the 4th reich. At this proposit Israel with their “greater Israel” which remember by near the “LEBENSRAUM”, are acting as ever, from when born, with terrorism and influencing american government to spread his terrorism in all Middle East, with same means of nazis. They must remember better what were nazis, but they remember nazis only when they have to gain public opinion in favor, in other situations, when they kill kids, old people, women, they use MSM with propaganda so brutal and non credible that all over the world the lies can’t be sustained for many time…..
    For what concern americans, they sustain Ucraina NAZI regime when make ethnic cleansing, or arming that nation hoping in a war with Russia, etc etc etc.
    But, in front at all of that evil behavior… WHERE IS ONU?
    I tell you all what I think: ONU MUST BE CLOSED, ONU IS USELESS, because too often ONU help americans to make wars or to cover crimes so infamous that the world MUST CHANGE HIS WAY……SOON!!!
    in case we do nothing, we are in a road without return

  4. Let me be VERY clear, as a Sunni Muslim, the Saudi’s have absolutely No moral authority over anything – much less religion. They have turned Mecca into a Las Vegas – Disneyesque cash cow, totally corrupting the intention of the Hajj.

Comments are closed.