LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook











Trump’s Iran Policy Is More about Rollback than Nukes

by Joshua Landis The renewed US offensive against Iran is not so much about its...

Message no image

Published on June 14th, 2012 | by Jasmin Ramsey

1

Thinking out of the box on Iran

Two pieces from Al Monitor provide fresh thinking from Washington on ways to deal with the Iranian nuclear issue and Tehran’s relationship with the international community. First, Laura Rozen shines the spotlight on recommendations by Pierre Goldschmidt, the former deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which revamp the current miniscule carrot, giant stick approach that Western countries have been taking with Iran. In short, the IAEA should offer Iran a “grace period” to disclose information about suspected previous military dimensions of its nuclear program and rather than be slapped with more sanctions or worse, offer a period of extended access for IAEA inspectors to confirm that its program is not advancing into the military realm. According to Goldschmidt, this is the stuff that “confidence-building” is made of.

“Such disclosures could be very beneficial for confidence building,” Goldschmidt wrote. “If Iran were to admit that it had been working towards becoming a nuclear threshold state and has undertaken some weaponization activities in the past, it would help persuade the international community that this time, Tehran has indeed opted for full cooperation and transparency.”

Next Barbara Slavin explains why U.S. insistence that Iran be excluded from multilateral planning sessions on Syria could prove detrimental to solving the crisis:

As despicable as Iran’s intervention on the side of Assad’s killing squads may be, Iran has major interests in Syria that cannot be ignored. An Iranian ally for more than three decades, Syria is a conduit for Iran to aid Hezbollah in Lebanon and a base Iran has used to support Palestinian militants. Iran, as the largest majority-Shiite nation, also identifies with the Alawite Assad regime and with Syria’s Alawite minority.

US diplomats have included Iran in discussions about other countries — most recently Iraq and Afghanistan — where Iran also has major national-security interests and an ability to shore up or sabotage stability.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


One Response to Thinking out of the box on Iran

Show Comments >



  1. avatar Shawn says:

    But it’s not clear that Iran ever tried to weaponize. They would firmly deny it. Khamenei was in charge during those years that Iran supposedly did try to weaponize, and he has always maintained that nuclear weapons are religiously forbidden. He would lose his credibility if Iran were to admit weaponization attempts, assuming they ever engaged in it.

    Seems impractical.


About the Author

avatar

Jasmin Ramsey is an Iranian-born journalist based in Washington, DC.



Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!