LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook











Trump’s Iran Policy Is More about Rollback than Nukes

by Joshua Landis The renewed US offensive against Iran is not so much about its...

Analysis Barack_Obama_makes_a_telephone_call

Published on February 7th, 2017 | by Guest

3

RT: Call Iran!

by Navid Hassibi

A link needs to be urgently established between Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and newly sworn-in Secretary of State Rex Tillerson amid the needless escalation in tension between the Trump administration and Iran. This week alone, the Trump White House imposed a blanket travel ban on Iranian nationals. Iran launched a provocative missile test and reciprocated with its own travel ban (since rescinded, at least for the U.S. wrestling team), which in turn led to Trump putting Iran “on notice” and imposing additional non-nuclear sanctions. The president has also been tweeting impulsively against Iran, possibly in response to remarks made by Iranian officials dismissing his bellicosity. At this rate, the president is on track to ignite a needless and catastrophic conflict against a country that had a functional rapport with the previous U.S. administration thanks to the historic nuclear deal. A line of communication between the Trump administration and Iran’s leadership is desperately needed.

It would be a shame for the United States to throw away the channel that was developed between the Obama administration and Iran via former Secretary John Kerry and Foreign Minister Zarif. This channel was leveraged to secure a historic nuclear deal that peacefully removed the threat of war in an already volatile region of the world. It was also valuable for non-nuclear matters such as last year’s prisoner swap, the release of U.S. naval detainees by Iran, the settlement of a longstanding financial dispute, and some limited cooperation through the International Syria Support Group.

Thus far in the early stages of the Trump administration, Secretary Tillerson appears to be the most level-headed official on the issue of Iran. During his Senate confirmation hearing, he told the Foreign Affairs Committee that he did not reject the Iran nuclear deal outright but, rather, supported a full review as well as possibly renegotiating it or negotiating a follow-up agreement. Unlike Defense Secretary James Mattis, National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, and CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who are all ardent Iran hawks, Tillerson’s willingness to maintain the Iran deal and negotiate a follow-up arrangement reflects his openness to talk to Iran. Last year, while still CEO of ExxonMobil, he indicated that he would consider doing business in Iran. He said in a television interview that ExxonMobil would certainly take a look at investing in Iran “because it’s a huge resource-owning country.”

A call between Tillerson and Zarif is urgently advised as a tit-for-tat escalation in rhetoric and action can head only in one direction, confrontation. In this light, the deputy chief of staff of Iran’s president tweeted that the United States should de-escalate tensions and interact with Iran rather than challenge it. An introductory call would allow both foreign ministers to build a rapport. For the United States, this could add a voice of reason on U.S.-Iran relations within the White House. The risk exists that this may backfire as Trump marginalizes Tillerson in favor of the Iran hawks in the administration. There is also the risk that Tillerson will side with the Iran hawks. But, still, it is worth the effort.

On matters of war and peace, diplomacy is worth every bit of effort, even if that means picking up the phone and making a call.

Navid Hassibi is with the Council on International Policy. He tweets @navidhassibi. The opinions here represent his own.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


3 Responses to RT: Call Iran!

Show Comments >



  1. avatar rosemerry says:

    T. rex is only interested in business. A diplomat (isn’t that what his job is?) should want peace.

  2. avatar Esfandi says:

    I couldn’t agree more with that article. It is critical to reestablish some contact. I am sympathetic to the regime of the shah which despite all its flaws, worked for iran and the iranian people but I am really afraid of the close relations between the mujahedin khalk and trump administration. Even the current regime would still be better than comrade rajavi and her saudi monies.

  3. avatar delia ruhe says:

    Traditionally, it’s risky to let foreign relations be governed by economics, but these days marketplace morals are starting to look fairly benign next to the alternatives, which reek of Washington hypocrisy. In this particular case, Iran is eager to get its economy up to snuff to meet the demands of its bright future within Eurasia, as it embarks on the biggest development project in the history of humankind. So make that call, Rex!


About the Author

avatar

Articles by guest writers.



Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!