More on Potential Iranian Reax To Military Strike

Via Mondoweiss, Juan Cole’s excellent Informed Comment site is currently carrying an analysis by Middle East and terror expert Mahan Abedin that explores Iran’s likely options and fallout should the United States use bombers to attack the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. Eli addressed this scenario last week using Patrick Disney’s analysis, and this latest attempt at gazing into the crystal ball is no less sobering.

Abedin writes:

A top priority for the IRGC high command is to respond so harshly and decisively so as to deter the Americans from a second set of strikes at a future point. The idea here is to avoid what happened to Iraq in the period , when the former Baathist regime was so weakened by sanctions and repeated small-scale military attacks that it quickly collapsed in the face of American and British invading armies.

The range of predictable responses available to the IRGC high command include dramatic hit ad run attacks against military and commercial shipping in the Persian Gulf, the use of mid-range ballistic missiles against American bases in the region and Israel and a direct assault on American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. All these options are likely to be used within 48 hours of the start of hostilities.

What is less predictable is the response of the IRGC Qods Force, which is likely to be at the forefront of the Pasdaran’s counter-attack. One possible response by the Qods force is spectacular terrorist-style attacks against American intelligence bases and assets throughout the region. The IRGC Qods Force is believed to have identified every key component of the American intelligence apparatus in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan. They are likely to put this information to good use, especially since the Qods Force suspects that the CIA had a hand in last October’s Jundullah-organised suicide bombing targeting IRGC commanders in Iran’s volatile Sistan va Baluchistan province.

The IRGC navy will also play a key asymmetrical role in the conflict by organising maritime suicide bombings on an industrial scale. By manning its fleet of speedboats with suicide bombers and ramming them into American warships and even neutral commercial shipping, the Pasdaran will hope to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 40 percent of world crude oil supplies pass.

The combination of these asymmetrical forms of warfare with more conventional style missile and even ground force attacks on American bases in the region will likely result in thousands of American military casualties in the space of a few weeks. The IRGC has both the will and wherewithal to inflict a level of casualties on American armed forces not seen since the Second World War.

Even if the United States manages to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and much of the country’s military assets, the IRGC can still claim victory by claiming to have given the Americans a bloody nose and producing an outcome not dissimilar from the Israeli-Hezbollah military engagement in the summer of 2006.

The political effect of this will likely be even more explosive than the actual fighting. Not only will it awaken the sleeping giant of Iranian nationalism, thus aligning the broad mass of the people with the regime, it will also shore up Iran’s image in the region and prove once and for all that the Islamic Republic is prepared to fight to the death to uphold its principles. Suddenly Iran’s allies in the region – particularly non-state actors like Hezbollah and Hamas – would stand ten feet tall.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Ali Gharib

Ali Gharib is a New York-based journalist on U.S. foreign policy with a focus on the Middle East and Central Asia. His work has appeared at Inter Press Service, where he was the Deputy Washington Bureau Chief; the Buffalo Beast; Huffington Post; Mondoweiss; Right Web; and Alternet. He holds a Master's degree in Philosophy and Public Policy from the London School of Economics and Political Science. A proud Iranian-American and fluent Farsi speaker, Ali was born in California and raised in D.C.



  1. If ever the US or Israel launch nuclear weapons at Iran, then violence against US or Israeli interests all over the world will be so huge as to overwhelm the mothers.

    The Americans will be taught a spanking good lesson. They are merely one of several hundred countries on this earth, they are NOT special.

  2. This is so true but it is sad that the people hellbent on starting a Middle East war live thousand of miles from the area of conflict and hope that the war will not touch them. They are so mistaken but will realise to late that such a war will impact on EVERYONE.

  3. To the neocon crazies, Armagedonites, Lebensraum Zionists and oil company executives the “bloody nose” Iran might inflict are acceptable losses.

  4. It may be speculative, but not entirely improbable to conclude that an Israeli or American strike on Iran may result in WW-III. If the Iranians manage to sink several U.S. ships, including an aircraft carrier or two, the U.S. response might go nuclear…radiation drifting towards Russia…who knows? It’s an extremely dangerous wild card. And I don’t put it past Israel to play it (and suck us in).

  5. Israel has already drawn the US into the Iraq’s quagmire at a cost of $3-3.5 trillion. They know that they control Washington and they won’t hesitate to drag corrupt politicians into another confrontation in the Middle East. It costs them no blood and no money and I don’t see why they should not use AIPAC to do just that.

    The truth is that they may end up being in a more unsafe position after the attack than before because even if only one of Iran’s missile penetrates their bunker in the Negev desert and sets off a nuclear device, that’s the end of Israel – a territory of less than 22,000 square miles!!!

Comments are closed.