Bloomberg Refudiates “Ground Zero Mosque” Demagoguery

While everyone from former half-term Alaskan governors to former Georgia congressmen to heads of major Jewish civil rights organizations seems to feel entitled to offer their opinion on the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” — the subject of Ali’s excellent post of a few days ago — New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg issued a statement today injecting a measure of sanity into the debate and implicitly criticizing his former party-mates for their political opportunism and shameless demagoguery. Take, for instance, this passage:

Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question –should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here.

This appears to be a none-too-subtle rebuke of Newt Gingrich’s bizarre-to-say-the-least claim that there “should be no mosque near Ground Zero in New York so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia.” Similarly, I can’t help but wonder whether Bloomberg’s professed hope that the mosque will “help repudiate the false and repugnant idea that the attacks of 9/11 were in any way consistent with Islam” (my emphasis) was an allusion to the aforementioned former half-term Alaska governor’s well-known adventures with the English language.

In any case, taken together with today’s ruling by the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission clearing the way for construction, Bloomberg’s statement should help put this phony controversy to rest. More than a few public figures have made themselves look awfully foolish in the process, however — Palin and Gingrich, to be sure, but probably no one more than Anti-Defamation League head Abe Foxman.

Full statement below the jump:

The following are Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s remarks as delivered on Governors Island:

“We have come here to Governors Island to stand where the earliest settlers first set foot in New Amsterdam, and where the seeds of religious tolerance were first planted. We’ve come here to see the inspiring symbol of liberty that, more than 250 years later, would greet millions of immigrants in the harbor, and we come here to state as strongly as ever – this is the freest City in the world. That’s what makes New York special and different and strong.

“Our doors are open to everyone – everyone with a dream and a willingness to work hard and play by the rules. New York City was built by immigrants, and it is sustained by immigrants – by people from more than a hundred different countries speaking more than two hundred different languages and professing every faith. And whether your parents were born here, or you came yesterday, you are a New Yorker.

“We may not always agree with every one of our neighbors. That’s life and it’s part of living in such a diverse and dense city. But we also recognize that part of being a New Yorker is living with your neighbors in mutual respect and tolerance. It was exactly that spirit of openness and acceptance that was attacked on 9/11.

“On that day, 3,000 people were killed because some murderous fanatics didn’t want us to enjoy the freedom to profess our own faiths, to speak our own minds, to follow our own dreams and to live our own lives.

“Of all our precious freedoms, the most important may be the freedom to worship as we wish. And it is a freedom that, even here in a City that is rooted in Dutch tolerance, was hard-won over many years. In the mid-1650s, the small Jewish community living in Lower Manhattan petitioned Dutch Governor Peter Stuyvesant for the right to build a synagogue – and they were turned down.

“In 1657, when Stuyvesant also prohibited Quakers from holding meetings, a group of non-Quakers in Queens signed the Flushing Remonstrance, a petition in defense of the right of Quakers and others to freely practice their religion. It was perhaps the first formal, political petition for religious freedom in the American colonies – and the organizer was thrown in jail and then banished from New Amsterdam.

“In the 1700s, even as religious freedom took hold in America, Catholics in New York were effectively prohibited from practicing their religion – and priests could be arrested. Largely as a result, the first Catholic parish in New York City was not established until the 1780’s – St. Peter’s on Barclay Street, which still stands just one block north of the World Trade Center site and one block south of the proposed mosque and community center.

“This morning, the City’s Landmark Preservation Commission unanimously voted not to extend landmark status to the building on Park Place where the mosque and community center are planned. The decision was based solely on the fact that there was little architectural significance to the building. But with or without landmark designation, there is nothing in the law that would prevent the owners from opening a mosque within the existing building. The simple fact is this building is private property, and the owners have a right to use the building as a house of worship.

“The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right – and if it were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question – should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here. This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions, or favor one over another.

“The World Trade Center Site will forever hold a special place in our City, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves – and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans – if we said ‘no’ to a mosque in Lower Manhattan.

“Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values – and play into our enemies’ hands – if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists – and we should not stand for that.

“For that reason, I believe that this is an important test of the separation of church and state as we may see in our lifetime – as important a test – and it is critically important that we get it right.

“On September 11, 2001, thousands of first responders heroically rushed to the scene and saved tens of thousands of lives. More than 400 of those first responders did not make it out alive. In rushing into those burning buildings, not one of them asked ‘What God do you pray to?’ ‘What beliefs do you hold?’

“The attack was an act of war – and our first responders defended not only our City but also our country and our Constitution. We do not honor their lives by denying the very Constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor their lives by defending those rights – and the freedoms that the terrorists attacked.

“Of course, it is fair to ask the organizers of the mosque to show some special sensitivity to the situation – and in fact, their plan envisions reaching beyond their walls and building an interfaith community. By doing so, it is my hope that the mosque will help to bring our City even closer together and help repudiate the false and repugnant idea that the attacks of 9/11 were in any way consistent with Islam. Muslims are as much a part of our City and our country as the people of any faith and they are as welcome to worship in Lower Manhattan as any other group. In fact, they have been worshipping at the site for the better part of a year, as is their right.

“The local community board in Lower Manhattan voted overwhelming to support the proposal and if it moves forward, I expect the community center and mosque will add to the life and vitality of the neighborhood and the entire City.

“Political controversies come and go, but our values and our traditions endure – and there is no neighborhood in this City that is off limits to God’s love and mercy, as the religious leaders here with us today can attest.”

Daniel Luban

Daniel Luban is a postdoctoral associate at Yale University. He holds a PhD in politics from the University of Chicago and was formerly a correspondent in the Washington bureau of Inter Press Service.



  1. In response to:

    “Beste makes a false analogy when he compares this Muslim center to a Nazi flag being raised at the site of a destroyed synagogue. It’s not al Qaeda that’s looking to open center at the site. That of course would be impermissable.”

    The Nazis ruled a specific country, Germany. Al Qaeda is not designated to one country, or one ethnic group. The only thing that binds the members of Al Qaeda is their religion: Islam. Al Qaeda is indeed supporting the opening of this mosque.

    The same people who fund Al Qaeda are funding this grotesque monument to their great victory at Ground Zero. Muslims from all over the world will come to pray and celebrate their martyrs at this site of our greatest national tragedy.

    Beste makes an absolutely correct analogy. Those who helped make the 9/11 attack possible are making this mosque possible. That is the politically incorrect truth. Islam has for centuries demonstrated it cannot peacefully coexist with any other religion.

    Bloomberg is vile and reprehensible, as is this Islamic victory monument.

  2. To Disgusted- no, wrong; Al Queda is actually not so much Muslim as political, and at the most representative of a tiny splinter group within a splinter sect of Islam Unless this mosque is going to be Wahabi, and specifically, Al Queda’s version of Wahabi, Al Queda will in fact add it to their list of targets. If it’s not there already.

  3. To Disgusted: When you claim “Those who helped make the 9/11 attack possible are making this mosque possible”, are you claiming

    a) that those who are giving financial support to the mosque are the same individuals or organizations that fund al-Qaeda?


    b) that Muslims, by being Muslim, give al-Qaeda its reason for existence just as they do the same for this mosque?

    If the answer is (a), I’d like to see some evidence. If the answer is (b), it’s laughably transparent bigotry.

    Either way, I’d like to remind you of another terrorist attack, by the a group of Catholics led by Guy Fawkes, against the British Houses of Parliament in 1605. Considering that this attack (which failed, of course) was explicitly motivated by religious differences, would Britain be justified, in your view, in banning any Catholic church within a certain radius of the Houses of Parliament? Considering the amount of terrorism that has attended the conflict between Catholics and Protestants over the centuries between 1517 and 1998, is it your view that Catholics (or Protestants) have proven that they can’t live peacefully with other religions?

    You’re conflating at least three things: a major world religion with the same internal diversity of views that you find in Christianity or Buddhism; a radical extremist sect of that religion; and a small (<1000 members) terrorist organization.

    Acquire some logic. Failing that, rent some, please.

  4. Don’t you understad? There are muslim Terrorists everywhere! They might be under your bed! Their navy, air force, and army might take over the US at any time. They will make our woman wear burquas and we will have to follow shakira (isn’t she hot) law. I’m going to sleep with my night light on and curl up with my blankey. I’ll be safe then. Sheesh… America… Land of the frightened… Home of the sniveling cowards.

  5. why is michael bloomberg in this gop hes a lousy liberal throw him out payng people off why is this creep not investergator

Comments are closed.