Sen. Menendez Top Recipient of MEK-Related Campaign Funding

by Jim Lobe

As readers of this blog already know, Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) was the top congressional recipient of “pro-Israel” campaign funding in the 2012 election cycle, the last time he ran for office, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. He has since distinguished himself as the leading proponent among Senate’s Democrats of new sanctions against Iran. He has repeatedly co-sponsored sanctions legislation—with Mark Kirk (R-IL), the top recipient of pro-Israel campaign funding for the past decade—with the ostensible purpose of increasing pressure on Tehran to make far-reaching concessions at the negotiating table.

It appears that Menendez has also been the top recipient of campaign funding from donors with ties to the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MeK), the cultish group that was until recently included on the State Department’s terrorism list, according to a new investigative report published Thursday by LobeLog alumni and occasional contributors Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton on The Intercept website. The article, “Long March of the Yellow Jackets: How a One-Time Terrorist Group Prevailed on Capitol Hill,” details how Menendez, then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, maintained a hold for some six months—from July 2013 until late January 2014—on an arms package for the Iraqi government that included 24 Apache helicopters. Menendez explained publicly that he was concerned about then-Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s record of attacks against civilians and his tacitly allowing Iran to use Iraqi airspace to transport weapons to Syria.

But Ali and Eli cite sources that cumulatively suggest that Menendez’s position may have been influenced by intense lobbying on the part of pro-MeK individuals, including the lobbyist for one of the MeK’s political fronts and Menendez’s immediate predecessor, Robert Torricelli. Menendez finally lifted his hold after the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) launched their first major offensive into al-Anbar province from bases along the Syrian-Iraqi border, taking Fallujah and most of Ramadi.

As noted in the article, the delayed Apaches would not likely have been ready to be flown by Iraqi pilots by the time ISIL launched its January offensive even if the hold had been lifted six months before. But the fact that those six months were lost made Baghdad more reliant on the air power of the United States and other countries (including Iran) to halt ISIL’s advance some nine months later after the jihadi group and its tribal allies had captured Mosul and driven to within 30 kilometers of Kirkuk. Although it would be unfair to conclude that Menendez was motivated only by his sympathy for the MeK, sources quoted by Ali and Eli suggest pretty strongly that the issue played a role. As Iraq’s ambassador to the United States Lukman Faily told Ali in relation to his efforts to release the hold on the Apaches, “The issue of the MEK came up in most of my meetings with the House and Senate, especially the Foreign [Relations Committee].”

According to the article,Menendez accepted more than $25,000 from donors with ties to the MEK, making him the largest recipient from 2012, when the MeK was delisted that September, to the present. That’s not much compared to the well over $300,000 Menendez received from pro-Israel groups during the 2012 election cycle, but it was more than twice what was provided to the next biggest recipients, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA).

In any event, the article casts light on the seamier side of the politics around Iran, and it’s a good read besides.

Jim Lobe

Jim Lobe served for some 30 years as the Washington DC bureau chief for Inter Press Service and is best known for his coverage of U.S. foreign policy and the influence of the neoconservative movement.



  1. Why are we still sending arms packages to Iraq? They just wind up in the hands of ISIS anyway.

    Jim Lobe – you did not explain who/what MEK is exactly, its motivations, agenda etc. This is like half an article!

    AND, wrt Open Secrets – depressing to see my own senator Bob Casey’s name on the list, with Pro-Israel donations of $135K. I read his 2011 AIPAC speech, and it was so fawning, so by the (Zionist) book. Aghh.

  2. There’s the reason for the senator to Introducing one Bill after another for further sanctions! He is receiving funds from once US recognized terrorist organization, the MEK! I feel sorry for the senator and his actions speak for themselves and there’s no need to further elaborate!!

  3. This is emblematic to what’s wrong in the U.S. Congress today. Take all the money out of it, no lobbyists donations, no big givers as in millionaires/billionaires, but more importantly, reduce the number of staff to do the business that the elected individuals were elected to do. Also, take away all the perks not available to the general public, ban the PAC’s, make any-any-group lobbying for any-any foreign government to register as such and ban any giving of money’s that can/are bribes to influence the outcome in favor of those bribes. That would be a start. Perhaps as with the recent “Net Neutrality’ “decision”, because of the overwhelming demand of the people, the above changes may have a chance of becoming a reality, providing the Supreme Court doesn’t pull a switcharoo?

  4. Oh, I forgot to add that Menendez looks to be on the verge of tears because he’s been shown to be one of those who has sold his soul for that bag of silver. Boo Hoo.

  5. The nation is always going to have crooked politicians, but there used to be more honest ones (or ones paid by different masters) to counter them. Alas, the national politicians now all seem to agree with each other on policies destructive of the best national interests. If a good one appears, he/she is driven off, which reminds me I try to keep track of Cynthia McKinney on her facebook page.

    Also I have recently learned that the US ambassadors to Netherlands and France (and I suppose many more) got their positions because of their success in bundling more than a million dollars in campaign contributions for Obama. Lawyers are good at this.

    MEK is an anti-Iran group with a history in Iraq, where they are currently under siege by Baghdad. MEK has enjoyed the support by some prominent Americans.

Comments are closed.