LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook

Poll: Three Quarters of Americans Support the Iran Deal

by Derek Davison If Donald Trump succeeds in pulling the U.S. out of the Iran...

US Foreign Policy no image

Published on August 11th, 2011 | by Jasmin Ramsey


If sanctions aren’t enough, what is?

The neoconservative-led push to convince the world that sanctioning Iran isn’t enough to halt its alleged nuclear ambitions is gaining momentum by the day.

The author(s) of an unsigned August 11 Wall Street Journal article in its “Review and Outlook” section accordingly writes that Iran has been given an “E-Z Pass” for individuals who have been sanctioned for their involvement with its nuclear power program. Iran is accused of exploiting sanction “loopholes” by naming these officials to high government posts to “mock” the UN and the EU. The author then indirectly quotes his/her “friends” at the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) to argue that the EU and the U.S. aren’t “serious” with their sanctioning efforts.

The piece ends with the appearance of providing a balanced assessment of the pros and cons of sanctions while arguing that they’re actually not helpful at all (emphasis is mine):

Sanctions can play a helpful, if never decisive, role in increasing the costs to Iran for refusing to comply with U.N. resolutions and stop its nuclear programs. But there’s no point in enacting sanctions if there is no serious intention of enforcing them. When the best the international community can do against Iran is a sanctions E-Z Pass, it’s no wonder Iran’s illicit nuclear programs are speeding ahead in broad daylight.

Is this WSJ piece part of the increasingly aggressive hawk-led campaign to push for Iraq-style sanctions on Iran or something more? And as the 2012 U.S. presidential election approaches, how will unchecked pressure to take a hardline approach to Iran affect the candidates’ Mideast policies?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 Responses to If sanctions aren’t enough, what is?

Show Comments >

  1. avatar Jon Harrison says:

    Ah, the war among the clerks continues. Why not rename this space iranlog? Why keep fighting this war of (meaningless) words when earth-shaking events are taking place elsewhere?

  2. avatar scott says:

    The neo-cons are content with the Sword of Damacles hanging over Iran. They’ll keep their powder dry for the right time. An accident at sea, a provocative act, black ops incitement. They’ll keep their guns sighted, waiting, waiting. And, once ANY casus belli happens, they will get to be the ever vigilant, prescient men with all the answers. Of course, it will only be a case of a broken clock being right twice a day.

  3. avatar Jon Harrison says:

    Can you mix any more metaphors in that comment, Scott?

About the Author


Jasmin Ramsey is an Iranian-born journalist based in Washington, DC.

Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!