LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook

David Petraeus Finally Answers His Own Question

by Tom Engelhardt It took 14 years, but now we have an answer. It was March...

Message no image

Published on February 2nd, 2011 | by Guest


Clearer U.S. Position on Mubarak Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

By Emad Mekay

When I made my last post about the U.S. role in backing Mubarak, I hadn’t realized that Obama asked for “an orderly transition” that must begin “now” in Egypt. I am not changing my earlier post though. This is because it does reflect the growing general sentiment in Egypt about the U.S. role. This confusion over the nature of the U.S. position is partly due to several reasons.

One of them the “low voice” with which the U.S. has asked for the transition. Egypt is very noisy now. There are no words that I can think of that describes the turmoil. Lots of voices are flying over and positions are changing by the minute.

The U.S. shouldn’t consider that one statement by the White House or two or three would be enough for Egyptians to understand what Washington wants. They should elaborate their position more assertively and more often and in different words.

For the U.S. to be heard it must speak more clearly and more often.

Also, Washington should remember that Egyptians had no access to the Internet or proper communications for the past five days. For more accurate information on the U.S. position, the U.S. needs someone who speaks Egyptian Arabic to say it. There are many of them in Washington right now for sure. The British have their own Arabic speaking pressman who appears often now on TV stations. Why not the U.S.?

The confusion over the U.S. position comes too because the U.S. took too long for its position to crystallize and come out in the open. The understanding is that Mubarak has been a leading U.S. ally. Protestors would say a U.S. lapdog. For that impression to change, the U.S. needs to speak forcefully and in unambiguous terms. I do not think Mubarak will ever be the same. His tactics to fight his last battle are thuggish in nature. That is enough for Washington to distance itself from him now.

Thanks to one friend in the U.S., now I know what Obama said. How many Egyptian have friends in America like I do? The U .S. should understand this. Get the word out or risk losing another Middle East country.

Here’s what Obama said:

Now, it is not the role of any other country to determine Egypt’s leaders. Only the Egyptian people can do that. What is clear — and what I indicated tonight to President Mubarak — is my belief that an orderly transition must be meaningful, it must be peaceful, and it must begin now.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

One Response to Clearer U.S. Position on Mubarak Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Show Comments >

  1. avatar Jon Harrison says:

    I have to believe Obama’s sympathies are with the protestors. And I’d bet a majority of Americans feel the same way; I know I do.

    That said, it’s difficult for Obama to do more. If he speaks out even more strongly in favor of Mubarak’s immediate departure, he risks a backlash from Mubarak and his supporters. Moreover, he would appear to be imposing America’s view on another country; surely this would be seen as an exercise in imperialism, even though in a good cause? Additionally, some people, both in America and abroad, would look on such behavior as a betrayal of a longtime and faithful ally.

    For thirty years America has been paying a heavy price its support of the Shah in Iran. Now we are beginning to pay the price for our short-sighted policy of supporting autocrats in the Arab world.

About the Author


Articles by guest writers.

Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!