Are the MEK and Regime Change Finally Running Out of Road?

MEK

by Anne and Massoud Khodabandeh

The “regime change in Iran” bandwagon—driven by warmongers, fueled by false prophesy, and hurtling pell-mell down the road to Iran—contains various characters, some new and some old.

The bandwagon itself is an ideological construct created 40 years ago in response to the Iranian Revolution. It has taken on various incarnations over the years, but its central purpose has always been to destroy the Islamic Republic of Iran and replace it with a compliant pro-American government. What that is hardly matters of course, as was the case with Iraq in 2003.

The drivers of this bandwagon are paid large sums to pursue this agenda at any cost. Others are mere passengers, hoping for a role after the vehicle reaches the destination. Among these passengers is the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), formerly a terrorist group and currently “democratic opposition.” The MEK has been a passenger for all 40 years of the journey, hanging on by paying the drivers. These drivers are public persons such as National Security Advisor John Bolton and Trump lawyer Rudi Giuliani, along with a host of other “influential” persons who steer the bandwagon inexorably toward conflict.

But just as the bandwagon appears to be gathering speed and momentum—enough to scare the Trump administration’s opponents—the MEK appears to be running out of road. And that could signal a halt to the whole enterprise.

The first sign of this came in a piece by Eli Clifton, which discussed the provenance of a large payment ($165,000) received by John Bolton in relation to a tweet to “defend a non-governmental anti-Iran pressure group, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI)…”. Clifton’s own tweet was met by a couple of feeble MEK slave troll posts on his thread spouting the usual “no appeasement” and “terrorist Iran” themes. This indicates that the MEK has been outbid by a new bandwagon passenger UANI, since the MEK only managed $40,000 for one of Bolton’s speeches. Also, the MEK trolls are running out of steam back in their closed camp in Albania.

Even while Bolton and the Trump administration, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman are pushing for a war with Iran, they are beginning to realize that the MEK is not the stick needed to strike fear into the enemy. Indeed, a look at the recent behaviour of the MEK in Albania reveals a failing group beset by internal crisis.

After a series of critical investigative articles by reporters from Al Jazeera, The Guardian, The Independent, Channel 4 News, NBC, and others, the recent report in Der Spiegel by Luisa Hommerich was apparently the last straw. The MEK issued a Farsi language statement (written and published in Europe) threatening to assassinate her—for just doing her job.

Hommerich reported that inside the camp in Albania, MEK militants were still practicing the deadly techniques for combat taught them by Saddam Hussein’s Republican Guard—“cutting throats with a knife,” “breaking hands,” “removing eyes with fingers,” and “tearing the mouth open.” In 2017, the Trump administration reversed a 2013 plan by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to establish a De-Radicalisation Institute to disband and rehabilitate the MEK, allowing the dangerous cult to regroup behind closed doors in a de facto extra-territorial enclave and continue its violent practices.

In spite of this boost, the MEK, beset by exposures and defections, is trying to prevent the total collapse of the group. Around a thousand members have left the group since it relocated to Albania. The front line over which the MEK peers at its enemy, the Islamic Republic, is no longer Iraq but is now represented by a group of 40 former members protesting in Tirana. The MEK claim that these are all “agents of the Iranian regime” who want to kill the remaining cult members. So, instead of orchestrating regime change in Iran, the MEK can’t even deal with 40 destitute former members.

The MEK is engaged in a form of modern slavery by not paying thousands of activists for 30 years or more. Members who leave the group are left destitute because they have nothing but the clothes on their back even after decades of loyal service. The MEK claims that members offer their services as “volunteers.” But the preamble to the UN Declaration of Human Rights states in its opening sentence that human rights are inalienable—that is, they cannot be disowned by anyone for any reason. MEK leader Maryam Rajavi is responsible for such decisions and treatment.

Not only are the defectors that Hommerich profiles impoverished because they have not had financial recompense for their years of devotion, they are also deliberately left stateless. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees brought the MEK to Albania from Iraq on “humanitarian grounds.” But on arrival they were not granted UN refugee status, nor have they been issued Albanian identity documents that would allow them to work or travel. Lack of residency rights also means that they cannot register for a bank account. They have no identity papers whatsoever, except the flimsy piece of paper used to fly them through international airspace from Baghdad to Tirana.

In her pursuit of fame and glory, Maryam Rajavi treats her members as, essentially, cannon fodder. In the idealized future she paints for the members, they will one day march on Tehran, the vanguard of a spontaneous uprising of the Iranian people against their Islamic oppressors, the mullahs. Why would they need money or identity papers?

In the meantime, it suits Rajavi to have her “followers” incarcerated in a closed camp unable to live independent lives, subject to the whims and demands of the struggle that she purports to lead. But that struggle has almost evaporated. Sure, the MEK is still performing propaganda tasks for various Saudis, Israelis, and Americans to advance the anti-Iran push. But even that is becoming more and more irrelevant as the MEK itself begins to fail.

Massoud Khodabandeh is the director of Middle East Strategy Consultants and has worked long-term with the authorities in Iraq to bring about a peaceful solution to the impasse at Camp Liberty and help rescue other victims of the Mojahedin-e Khalq cult. Among other publications, he co-authored the book “The Life of Camp Ashraf: Victims of Many Masters” with his wife Anne Singleton. They also published an academic paper on the MEK’s use of the Internet. Anne Khodabandeh is a UK expert in anti-terrorist activities and a long-standing activist in the field of deradicalization of extremists. She has written several articles and books on this subject, along with her husband, who is of Iranian origin. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
avatar

Guest Contributor

Articles by guest writers.

SHOW 5 COMMENTS

5 Comments

  1. The whole of Iran wants peaceful regime change. The Ayatollahs are only there because they have weapons.

  2. MR Mostofi aka “must earn a fee”, Its extremely telling as well as amusing for you to have the audacity to even comment on this very post. After all it was an informative article telling how those agents who have a job of working on line to create and maintain the narrative of regime by any means(even if that means supporting a terrorist groups like MEK ,,,,,) you show up (no surprise at all and as your usual given mission) acting as representative of “all Iranians who want peaceful regime change”. that is a very wholesome statement of yours! and who are you again? for someone who hasn’t lived in Iran over four decades who do you exactly mean by Iranian people that you’re speaking for? We all know well by now that you are indeed a special passenger on that “regime change vehicle hoping to land a post after arriving at the destination”. Could you have been any more obvious as who you are and whom you working for? I’d let others to decide for themselves.

  3. The US laws don’t permit anyone on the government payroll to earn money on the side by giving speeches or tweeting in favor of one group or another. The laws apply to John Bolton as well and more than likely JB gets away with it by donating his earned side money such as $165000 to the Iranian and Venezuela opposition forces and their supporters. Sources of money in support of speech givers against Iran are known to be Mohammed-Butcher of- Saudi (MbS), Sheldon Adelson (UANI) and others, as stated in the article, who are advocating and cheerleading the US government for attacking Iran militarily!

    AliMostofi, how much money have you received for writing these stupid comments? If you are receiving any money to advocate war you are complicit with those who are advocating war against your birth place and you can be prosecuted as a traitor.
    Another question:
    What do you mean by writing “changing the regime in Iran peacefully”? Give us a few example of the methods that you are planning to deploy in order to accomplish the regime change peacefully. If you don’t have any examples then STFU or “khafeh show”.
    Final question:
    Did you know that if any of these MEK pawns step in the country, people in Iran will use MEK’s method of “tearing mouths” on these Pawns asses? Just saying!

  4. If MEK members had even a small brain they would look at their living condition and that of their leaders, then they would go and try to make life better for their family rather than panhandling around the world giving their money to their leaders who in return pays to John Bolton and Rudy Gioliani type of crook in a wane hope. With or without the Mullahs and their regime, MEK has no place in Iran.

  5. Look at the picture. Just look at all the smiling and happy MEK chicks. They must be doing something right where their members are so jubilant and this organization is so loved by Iranians.
    As usual, Americans got the right horse !! LOLOLOLOL

Comments are closed.