LobeLog on Facebook LobeLog on Facebook

Analysis 7940425740_1858cf3ee0_z

Published on August 26th, 2015 | by Eli Clifton

5

Booker Torn Between GOP Donors and His Party

by Eli Clifton

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) is feeling the heat. Progressive advocacy groups are pushing Democrats from one side to back the Obama administration’s plan to constrain Iran’s nuclear program. From the other side, meanwhile, New Jersey’s Republican Governor Chris Christie vows to lobby Booker to join the senior senator from New Jersey, Robert Menendez, in opposing the Iran deal.

NJ.com reports that Booker is probably under pressure from NORPAC, the pro-Israel PAC aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which has been “Booker’s biggest lifetime source of campaign cash, contributing or raising $158,871.” But NORPAC is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Booker’s support. Super PACs underwrote over a million dollars in independent expenditures to support Booker’s 2014 Senate campaign. Two of the most generous of these PACs received funding from Republican millionaires and billionaires opposed to the Iran deal, most of whom don’t even live in Booker’s home state of New Jersey.

According to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, Booker received $732,534 in supportive expenditures from the Independence USA PAC in the 2014 election cycle. Independence USA is exclusively funded by Michael Bloomberg. Writing in an August 10 column for Bloomberg View, the former New York City mayor claimed to be undecided about the Iran deal. But his scolding of the White House’s defense of the deal as “only hurting their credibility” and praise for New York Senator Chuck Schumer’s “thoughtful statement opposing the deal” leave little question about which way Bloomberg is leaning.

Independence USA PAC leaned Republican in 2014, spending $2,078,996 to support Democrats, $2,098,920 to support Republicans, and $1,403,868 against Democrats.

Booker’s second largest outside spender, Mobilization Project, supported only one campaign in the 2014 election cycle: $532,445 for Booker. Mobilization Project received its biggest infusion of cash, $137,564 from hedge funder Edward Nicoll. Hedge fund billionaire Seth Klarman (who serves on the board of the anti-Iran deal group The Israel Project), Michael Fux (who sat on the board of Friends of the Israel Defense Forces) contributed $100,000, and Ravenel B. Curry III (who serves as a trustee of the hawkish American Enterprise Institute) contributed $50,000.

According to the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, Klarman directs the vast majority of his political giving to Republicans.

In the 2014 election cycle, Nicoll only supported Booker and Fux directed most of his giving to Booker-supporting groups. Curry’s other major 2014 contribution, $500,000, went to the Freedom Partners Action Fund, which is spearheaded by the Koch brothers.

Michael Bloomberg, Seth Klarman, Edward Nicoll, and Ravenel Curry made their contributions from non-New Jersey addresses, suggesting that only Michael Fux is an actual resident of the state represented by Booker. (Edward Nicoll made campaign contributions from a New Jersey address until 2005.)

Several close friends of Cory Booker—Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, a former Republican congressional candidate, and New Jersey Governor, and Republican presidential candidate, Chris Christie—are pushing him to oppose the Iran deal. Boteach, both through his foundation and his congressional campaign, has been a recipient of GOP megadonor and Iran hawk Sheldon Adelson’s largesse. And Chris Christie’s relationship with Adelson has been an ongoing point of interest for those following the 2016 political horse race.

Booker may balk at the pressure and back Obama’s signature foreign policy accomplishment. But it will require standing up to a group of powerful and deep pocketed political donors, many of whom don’t reside in New Jersey or regularly support Democrats. Booker’s decision may come down to how big a debt of gratitude he feels he owes to his biggest financial supporters.

Photo of Cory Booker by Jamelle Bouie via Flickr


About the Author

avatar

Eli Clifton reports on money in politics and US foreign policy. Eli previously reported for the American Independent News Network, ThinkProgress, and Inter Press Service.



5 Responses to Booker Torn Between GOP Donors and His Party

Show Comments →



  1. avatar Bill Michtom says:

    Booker is co-chair of NewDeal, a 501(c)(4) issue-advocacy nonprofit one of the outgrowths of Citizens United that allows campaign activity without disclosing donors. It was organized to “highlight rising pro-business progressives,” an oxymoron if ever I’ve seen one.

    Booker is so devoted to corporations that he said on Meet the Press back in 2012 that he was “uncomfortable” with the Obama campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s career with Bain Capital.

    His devotion to corporate funding for himself seems much stronger than any support for Obama he might have.

  2. avatar richard vajs says:

    His Party or Big Pockets? What is Booker – a whore? He needs to go with what is right regardless of his prospects for advancement or greed.

  3. avatar > J. Mullen says:

    As with the reporting about Chuck Schumer, this report frames Cory Booker’s conundrum between his Jewish donors and his allegiance to the president. This isn’t it at all. It’s between keeping his donors or doing what is right for his country. Obama had it right when he said that to go along with Netanyahu would be to violate his obligations to his own country. The idea that Booker might oppose the deal out of “gratitude” to his donors comes very close to stating that he might choose money over his country.

  4. avatar remoteviewed says:

    Well if votes against the deal then I think his constituents should vote him out of office.

    AIPAC may have the money to bribe but they don’t have the vote.

    Also I think listing as a Foreign Agent is long overdue. In fact Kennedy proposed just that before he was gunned down in Dallas.

  5. avatar BEIJJING says:

    Simply put, he swore to uphold the Constitution of the US. To do otherwise would be an abdication of this oath and he should be voted out of office. A tool of Tel Aviv, he is a disgrace to his country, his constituents, his President, his party and his race, all of whom disagree with his position.

Back to Top ↑
  • Categories


  • Subscribe to LobeLog

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts