UANI, Joe Lieberman and the MEK

by Ali Gharib

I only have a few words to add to Jim’s post about United Against a Nuclear Iran naming Joe Lieberman as its new president. Those words are: Mojahedin-e Khalq. That’s the ex-terrorist Iranian opposition group, often known as the MEK, that has campaigned tirelessly for decades for regime change in Iran, and Joe Lieberman is one of their favorite advocates in Washington.

Here’s a bit of something I wrote in June about Lieberman’s positions on Iran and the MEK:

As far back as 2008, Lieberman was joking—yes, joking, as if this were a laughing matter—about the “appeal” of bombing Iran. In a 2010 speech to the Council on Foreign Relations that re-purposed many of the talking points Lieberman had used to push for the invasion of Iraq, he spoke of a six-month deadline—six months! in 2010!—for Iran to roll back its nuclear program before the U.S. had to seriously consider a military strike.

Lieberman’s been at it since then, too. In 2012, he said that a military strike could cause Iran’s nuclear program to “be delayed for enough years that we may hope and pray that there will be a regime change.” And that is the central point of Lieberman’s advocacy: he wants a U.S. policy of regime change. Just this month, he participated by video in a confab of the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), the ex-terrorist Iranian opposition group that relentlessly pushes for regime change.

“Inevitably,” Lieberman addressed the MEK members directly, “as individuals you may ask yourself: Is it possible that we can bring about a change of regime in Iran? And I want to say to you that it is. I’m confident that it is and it will happen.” The US, he said, “should be working closely with your resistance group.” The event was even the subject of a “sponsored report“—whatever that means—from The Washington Times that helpfully categorized Lieberman’s statements as “American support for regime change and the Iranian opposition.”

I mention this because of the raft of deal opponents who just won’t stop insisting that actually they don’t want war with Iran, they just want a “better deal.” If that’s the case, they ought to stop naming Joe Lieberman to prominent positions in their organizations. As it stands now, the hawkish former Democrat holds positions in several major anti-deal groups in Washington. Jim noted his roles at the AIPAC anti-deal spin-off (which has also promoted MEK materials in its advertisements), the American Enterprise Institute, and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, adding to that now his elevation from advisory board member at UANI to being its leader.

Fellow board members who actually support the Iran nuclear deal, such as Graham Allison and its Lieberman’s immediate predecessor, Gary Samore, might take note.

But hawkishness on Iran is a matter apart from support for the MEK. The group is reviled in Iran; it has launched terrorist attacks there; many impartial analysts have described it as a cult. Eli and I have already written about UANI’s targeting of legal humanitarian trade with Iran, and how it belies its professed solidarity with the Iranian people. Now, we can add UANI’s promotion of a pro-MEK hawk to that score. What’s worse, though, is the group’s elevation of a man who has such a cavalier attitude toward war with Iran and who wants official US policy toward the Islamic Republic to be regime change.

We’ve seen this move before with the Iraq war, and UANI seems determined to have Joe Lieberman, who, as Jim noted, was Honorary Co-Chair of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, return to star in the sequel.

Ali Gharib

Ali Gharib is a New York-based journalist on U.S. foreign policy with a focus on the Middle East and Central Asia. His work has appeared at Inter Press Service, where he was the Deputy Washington Bureau Chief; the Buffalo Beast; Huffington Post; Mondoweiss; Right Web; and Alternet. He holds a Master's degree in Philosophy and Public Policy from the London School of Economics and Political Science. A proud Iranian-American and fluent Farsi speaker, Ali was born in California and raised in D.C.



  1. These days everyone tries to nurture and support a Ruthless Terrorist Group as their proxy for carrying out their agenda! The new phenomenon include examples like MEK paid by Mosad, Saudis, AIPAC, UANI and Al-Qaida paid by the US, Saudis, Israel and ISIS paid by Saudis , Turkey and Hezbollah paid by Iran and on and on!
    “Hire to kill” no longer belongs to the fictional James Bond movies. It is the reality of the current governments around the world!

  2. Again, these are pretty old charges on the MEK. It’s like we’re going to keep rehashing these things, but not move forward. I mean, if Nelson Mandela can lead reconciliation in South Africa after what happened to him, it’s a wonder why people seem to feel threatened by a NGO like the MEK, UANI or any of these other anti-Iran groups. I mean, they are not the ones that control a standing army, have access to millions of barrels of oil, print money, own airlines and control communications companies. Nor do they run prisons, have courts, police forces or religious codes. They do have protestors, a couple of ex-elected officials, raise money to fund ad campaigns now and this is what is freaking you out? Really?

  3. Joe Lieberman opposed a public option for health care reform, Barbara C. and Mike F. And he supported John Bolton for U.N. Ambassador, something most all Democrats rightfully opposed.

    He’s not an honorable man, and he stopped being a decent Democrat a long time ago. He’s just a corrupt, vicious warmonger.

  4. Joe is always going to be a great Democrat in my mind. We can’t agree on all things, but he’s served the party with distinction and progressive causes over the last 30 years.

Comments are closed.