The Ugly Face of America

TheBlackRhino via Shutterstock

by Gordon Adams

Children are ripped from their parents at the border or lying dead, together, their arms around their father’s neck on the banks of the Rio Grande, the result of a cruel immigration strategy. Iranians face empty shelves and rising prices as US sanctions bite deeply. Palestinians, without work, are crowded into refugee camps in Gaza as public services slump, funding cut off by the United States. Cubans dealing with another devastating season of shortages of medicines and food as the United States tightens its embargo. Central Americans suffer at the hands of criminal and narcotics organizations and gang violence, having lost the pittance of resources they once had to relieve the violence as the United States cuts off assistance. Yemenis die daily under a rain of fire launched by Saudi aircraft, using American-supplied weapons.

The consistent effect of American intervention, cruel sanctions, and border chaos is human suffering. Wherever the Trump administration thinks it is making negotiating progress it has not only not made any progress, it is contributing to disastrous living conditions, suffering, and pain for the world’s people.

This is the ugly face of America. All of the virtues of this once-powerful country—its principles, its culture, its economic strength, its democratic governance—have collapsed in a rubble of devastation, pain, and suffering.

To state the obvious, the United States, even Donald Trump, is not responsible for all the political, economic, and social pain in the world.

Dislike of America is on the rise globally, however. Unlike the myth that American intends good in the world, and has occasionally provided some, today the world has no expectation that America intends any such thing.

An ugly foreign policy implemented by a powerful country has had exactly the opposite impact.  It does not strengthen leadership or respect. It confirms to others that they are on their own and need to leave the United States behind.

This shift in power was happening well before Trump came to office. It was apparent in the inevitable rise of Chinese military and economic power, the independent political and military actions of Putin’s Russia, the rise of Indian economic and military capabilities, and the independent foreign policy of a once-NATO-stalwart Turkey. It could be seen in the expansion of Iranian regional influence, the irrelevance of the United States in Syria, an assertive Germany and Japan, and in the failed U.S.-led interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The bullying cruelty of this administration’s foreign policy is gasoline poured on the burning fire of this rebalancing.

Is the suffering, cruelty, and lost reputation reversible? Whatever a different presidency or Congress brings to the table, the global tide has turned. The political class and chattering commentators do not quite get this, as yet. Too many people still dream of a “restoration” of American leadership, a return of the “exceptional” America that confronts China or Russia, a recreation of the “indispensable” nation that protects the global commons and the rules-based international order.  Those days are gone in a blistering fire accelerated by the Trumpian gasoline.

A return to generosity and the restoration of American democracy will not be enough. The United States has to recognize that power has shifted irreversibly. It must be willing to engage on equal terms with other global and regional powers and accept that Washington cannot do everything (and will not be welcome if it tries). The United States must be ready to confront real challenges like inequality, poverty, racism, prejudice, hatred, and a new climate that challenges human survival. Military cooperation, not supremacy, will be necessary. And, above all, U.S. diplomacy must be restored and reformed not just with more money but with more realistic thinking about American strategy.

The ugly American foreign policy will have to be replaced with a more benign, realistic engagement strategy that accepts that the United States is no longer “indispensable” but another player, among many, on the world stage.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
avatar

Gordon Adams

Gordon Adams is Professor Emeritus at the School of International Service, American University and, since 2008, a Distinguished Fellow (non-resident) at the Stimson Center both in Washington, DC. He taught at American University and George Washington University from 1999-2015. From 1993-97 he was Associate Director for National Security Programs at the Office of Management and Budget, the senior Clinton White House official for national security and foreign policy budgets. He is the co-editor of Mission Creep: The Militarization of US Foreign Policy (Georgetown, 2014), co-author of Buying National Security: How America Plans and Pays for Its Global Role and Safety at Home (Routledge, 2010), and author of The Iron Triangle: The Politics of Defense Contracting (Transaction Press 1981). He was founder and Director of the Defense Budget Project from 1983-93. He has a Ph.D from Columbia University. He writes frequently on foreign policy and national security issues for a wide variety of publications. He is also a working professional actor.

SHOW 6 COMMENTS

6 Comments

  1. …and this is written by a man long of tooth in international affairs. His views have contaminated students, pundits, and the media apparently for years. Read him with tolerance for errors.

  2. “All of the virtues of this once-powerful country—its principles, its culture, its economic strength, its democratic governance—have collapsed in a rubble of devastation, pain, and suffering.”
    Actually the US has a history of destroying others for power and profit since its settlement, when army posts were established with a mission of exterminating the native people. As for democratic governance, all it involves is voting for one schmuck or another, with only two bad choices, every four years, meanwhile US citizens are governed by . . .who? We need to identify them.
    But hey, let’s blame Trump, Hillary would have been better? The people’s representatives are studying the obvious Russian collusion because Hillary could not have lost on her own. She has a solid record of accomplishment as SecState: Syria, Libya, Afghanistan . .the list goes on.

  3. I’m sorry there are no empty shelves in any supermarket in Iran. Al is full an you’re totally wrong! Just visit any malls in Tehran or other cities. I wish I could enclose some photos here!

  4. All completely true. all will be equally completely ignored.I have another term for ‘American Exceptionalism’, from European history – the Divine Right of America.
    But the Mandate of Heaven has been removed. Sic transit gloria mundi.

  5. Most of the article is true unfortunately everything is expressed as a story rather than as a documentary. The author could have supported most of his claims with a lot of true background informations that are available today.
    The author also failed to link the US downtrend, which started with Nixon by opening the doors, to migration of the US industries to Asia in 1970’s. Then it was accelerated by Reagan with his deregulations of industries and banking allowing the investors to move their investment and industries to Asia at an even faster pace.
    The only major industrial base remained in the US was the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). The MIC began feeding the war beneficiaries and its associated sharks! Because of this the US has been stuck in this continuous war atttitude since invasion of Granada by Reagan and it continues until today and now is known as the “never ending wars”.
    Finally President Eisenhower’s prediction about the MIC taking charge and being in control of the country became true. As result the US has become the aggressor because she can and not because that she has to defend herself.

Comments are closed.