The NYT on Iran in Iraq: where’s the evidence?

According to this article in the New York Times last week, Iraq is supposedly cracking down on “Iran-backed Shiite militias.” But there’s no evidence in the actual piece to backup that juicy headline.

New York city based journalist Amel Ahmed tweeted a response to this by Professor Michael Brenner:

The New York Times headline bore almost no connection to the story’s content. Its main assertion certainly was not confirmed. I doubt this was an accident. It has been a feature of the Times’ coverage of Iran on the nuclear issue as well. Moreover, these Iran stories there and elsewhere are a striking example of reporters setting aside their critical minds, and duty to their readers, in swallowing whatever is offered them by official sources. “And Iran is behind it” has become a tag-on to government statements about all troubles in the region – whether Lebanon, Bahrain, Syria, Iraq or Afghanistan. It is almost like a nervous tick. Journalists have a responsibility to do do more than nod their heads in unison.

Well said.

Jasmin Ramsey

Jasmin Ramsey is a journalist based in Washington, DC.


One Comment

  1. No evidence of what, specifically? That Iraq is “cracking down” or that the militias are “Iranian-backed”? When it comes to Iran, you’re supposed to believe memes just because they get repeated over and over again. And that’s all. “Iranian nuclear weapons program” is another one.

Comments are closed.