LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook

Managing the Disruptive Aftermath of Somalia’s Worst Terror Attack

by International Crisis Group The devastating twin truck bombings in Somalia’s...

Analysis trump-carson-rubio

Published on October 13th, 2015 | by Eli Clifton


Rubio, Like Carson, Has the Answer to Human Rights Abuses: More Guns

by Eli Clifton and Ali Gharib

Ben Carson isn’t the only Republican presidential candidate with a history of making bizarrely ahistorical comments—”historical revisionism” isn’t nearly a strong enough term—to bolster the cause of gun nuts in America. Last week, the famed neurosurgeon said that if European Jews had been better armed, then the Holocaust wouldn’t have happened. Carson essentially blamed Nazi gun control for the deaths of six million Jews.

Another candidate, Marco Rubio, fast becoming a favorite of the GOP establishment, took on this meme years back, with a more recent but no less ahistorical example of a time when arms would have supposedly forestalled a tragedy. In June 2009, when he was a Senate candidate, Rubio seized upon the Green protest movement in Iran, which opposed the disputed re-election of then-Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to make the case that more guns make for a better world.

When the Green protest movement was met with a brutal crackdown—according to opposition estimates, more than 100 demonstrators were killed by Iranian security forces—Rubio took to Twitter to suggest that more guns could have altered the outcome:

This is not the only time Republicans have seized upon the theme of arming the Green Movement. In a telling moment during the 2012 presidential election campaign, the neoconservative pundit Charles Krauthammer was asked what more President Barack Obama could have done for the protest movement. “Weaponry!” Krauthammer blurted out.

Rubio’s commentary on guns and the Green Movement—more so than Krauthammer’s—betrays a disgraceful cynicism in trying to score political points off the spilled blood of Iranian citizens seeking justice. More importantly, it also revealed a deep and fundamental misunderstanding of what the Green Movement actually was. The movement was distinctly and avowedly non-violent. As an exiled Green leaders once put it, “We do not have any other choice than a nonviolent path toward democracy.”

So Rubio’s cheap political pro-NRA message was just as hollow as Krauthammer’s. The Green Movement was Iranian, not American. They wanted neither our Second Amendment nor our guns.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Comments are closed.

About the Author


Eli Clifton reports on money in politics and US foreign policy. Eli previously reported for the American Independent News Network, ThinkProgress, and Inter Press Service.

Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!