‘Obsession’ Gets Some Overdue Mainstream Attention

“Obsession,” the Islamophobic video that has been distributed via newspaper inserts to some 28 million households in key swing states this fall, is getting some overdue negative attention from the mainstream media at last. The Washington Post carried an article about the video Sunday that made it clear that the mass distribution was intended to influence the election in the Republicans’ favor. And Monday’s Atlantic online blog post by Jeffrey Goldberg, entitled “The Jewish Extremists Behind ‘Obsession'” was particularly notable.

He casts a remarkably negative light on Aish HaTorah, the Israeli organization whose U.S.-based officials, in Goldberg’s words, “are up to their chins in this project.” (I think IPS was the first news source to point out the connection between Aish and ‘Obsession’ in an article published back in March, 2007, although more has since come out, including a recent IPS update in September which noted other Israeli connections to the video and its distribution.)

I especially appreciated Goldberg’s identification of the Jerusalem Post’s Caroline Glick as one of his “favorite hysterics” — I posted on one of her fulminations last June — and as those behind the project as representing the “lunatic fringe.” In addition to Glick, who also heads the Middle East program at Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy, Goldberg would presumably apply that description to Daniel Pipes and Steven Emerson who played prominent roles in the video. It was Goldberg, a veteran of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), who wrote that passionate indictment, “Israel’s ‘America Problem'” in the Washington Post’s Outlook section last May of the major national Jewish organizations, particularly the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and AIPAC, for confusing “pro-Israe”l with being pro-settler in their advocacy efforts.

Of course, the producer/distributor of “Obsession” was the still-mysterious Clarion Fund, which has just released a sequel, “The Third Jihad” about which my colleague Eli Clifton posted earlier this month. The new video, originally intended for distribution before next week’s election, according to the Post’s article, suffered production delays (hence, the distribution of “Obsession” instead).

While I haven’t yet seen it, I understand that it features commentary by Clifford May of the Likudnik Foundation for the Defense of Democracy and, more prominently, Princeton historian and neo-con icon Bernard Lewis, who, according to various accounts, helped persuade Dick Cheney, among others, that the Iraq invasion would be a very good thing for all concerned. It was also Lewis who on August 8, 2006, predicted on the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would very possibly launch an attack on Israel exactly two weeks later, on August 22, to mark “the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to ‘the farthest mosque,’ usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back. This [date],” he went on, “might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel and if necessary of the world.” Goldberg’s words about “hysterics” and “the lunatic fringe” come to mind.

Nonetheless, it was just six months later that, with Cheney in attendance, Lewis delivered the American Enterprise Institute’s (AEI) annual Irving Kristol Lecture — in which he warned that militant Islam was launching its third attempt to conquer Europe and the West through “terror and migration.” And it was presumably after that that he sat down for a long interview with the Islamophobic makers of “Obsession” and “The Third Jihad.”

Incidentally, for a penetrating analysis of “Obsession”, read a review by David Shasha featured on Richard Silverstein’s blog at the Tikun Olam site.

Jim Lobe

Jim Lobe served for some 30 years as the Washington DC bureau chief for Inter Press Service and is best known for his coverage of U.S. foreign policy and the influence of the neoconservative movement.



  1. It wasn’t that long ago that people like Pipes and Glick were considered mainstream Zionists. They haven’t changed, but the world’s perception of Zionism has. I’m glad that they are now being regarded as the “lunatic fringe.” And if they’re now there, the Dershowitz’s and the Foxman’s should be put in the lunatic fringe category, too.

  2. The Israeli cult in this country never changes does it?

    How nice of Goldberg to dennounce the ‘fanatics’….and then go on to say that “Islam is bad enough without being labeled Nazis”.

    What if I wrote that Jews are bad enough without calling them zionist?

    How rough do the pro Israelis..all of them…. want to make it on themselves? Let’s see….

    Since they can’t live up this…..

    “US Oath of Allegiance ..

    “I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, .

    They should all leave. Go to Israel and work for Israel there not here.

  3. This is what is great about the internet (which ADL tends to want to censor). That is, the real truth about what goes on behind the scenes of those inflicting propaganda on America is exposed for all to see. No more reliance on the pro-Israel / anti-Muslim American media! Much to the discomfort, we see, to those desperately grasping for America’s passionate attachment to their unworthy cause…

    Deo Vindice!
    T. Pain

Comments are closed.