Akbar Ganji Says Military Attack on Iran Would Destroy Opposition

Akbar Ganji, the celebrated Iranian journalist and former political prisoner who will be honored with the Cato Institute’s Milton Friedman Liberty Prize for 2010 Thursday, spoke at the National Press Club here Monday, and, while he didn’t break any especially new ground, it’s worth noting a few things that he said about his views of the implications of policy options the U.S. faces vis-a-vis Tehran in the coming months.

First, he stressed, “democracy and human rights have taken root in Iran” despite the actions of increasingly arbitrary and iron-fisted rule of the current regime. “A military attack (on Iran) would destroy all of that,” he declared. The Green Movement, which Ganji obviously supports, would “melt away” if such an attack took place. In that context, he noted that the Bush administration’s military threats against Iran made it impossible for the Green Movement to emerge. But “the mere fact that Obama didn’t make military threats made the Green Movement possible,” Ganji said.

With respect to economic sanctions, Ganji noted that the Green Movement consists mostly of middle-class adherents and that “economic sanctions would destroy the middle class (and) … the Green Movement.” In any event, he went on, “the more economic sanctions are applied against Iran, the more the government will control the economy” due to the prevailing structures.

As to providing direct or indirect U.S. assistance to the Green Movement or other opposition sectors, Ganji was also very skeptical. “Any foreign intervention,” he said, “is bound to hurt us. (If it involves) any funding, people will look at us as mercenaries.” What the opposition needs, he went on, is “emotional and moral support.” In that respect the western media have a key role to play, he said, adding that Ahmadinejad quite deliberately provokes the press by taking the most radical positions — specifically, asserting that the Holocaust did not exist and that Israel should not exist. “It’s a game he always wins,” because that’s what the press keeps asking him about. “No one asks him about the situation in Iran” regarding human rights or the economy. “This is the direct help you can bring,” he told the dozen or so journalists who attended his presentation.

Jim Lobe

Jim Lobe served for some 30 years as the Washington DC bureau chief for Inter Press Service and is best known for his coverage of U.S. foreign policy and the influence of the neoconservative movement.



  1. Only about a dozen journalists showed up to hear him? That’s a shame. I hope I can catch his talk on CSpan. I’m glad Cato’s honoring him, and I’m glad you mentioned it here. You see what I mean when I say that libertarians and progressives have important things in common, and shouldn’t let our differences prevent us from cooperating against the common enemy?

  2. I don’t understand, is military actions so important? Why we can’t do some kind of “Velvet Revolution” in Georgia, or “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine? Remember how we support Leh Valenca’s “Solidarnost” in Poland, in 60-70s, with help from Pope John Paul II, who’s originally from Poland.
    Why don’t we start support an Iranian opposition, Western-minded and Western-thinking Iranians. This people, writers, intellectuals, best part of Iranian society. People who dropped out of their motherland after 1979’s Islamic Revolution. Now they living in Europe and in USA. We don’t ask their opinions, we not invite them to our talk-shows about this country. Instead we show all Iranians as sub-humans, mid-animals, or some kind of monsters from “Aliens” serie. This is another strong fails for our politicians

  3. Thank you but no thank you, if you stay out of our life we can handle things better and smoother. Once you got involve we have had taken the consequences for over fifty yeas. you do every things for your own interest and in this case interests of iranian people is not your interests. your made up human rights are conditional and foney keep it for yourself intil your people become educated and knowledgeable to defend their own rights.

Comments are closed.