LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook











Anti-Iran Deal Billionaire Tom Kaplan Lashes Out at Iran

by Eli Clifton A couple hours before and a few blocks away from where President...

Analysis moustacheman

Published on June 15th, 2015 | by Thomas Lippman

1

A Tiny But Positive Step in the Middle East

by Thomas W. Lippman

In the unending panorama of violence that is today’s Middle East, one hopeful note emerged earlier this month with a low-key announcement from Saudi Arabia that drew scant attention from the American news media.

King Salman appointed a military officer, Gen. Thamer al-Sabhan, to be the kingdom’s first resident ambassador in Baghdad since Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990.

If the appointment is a signal of a warming of relations between the two oil-producing Arab neighbors after decades of estrangement, it may remove a lingering irritant to the region’s troubled sectarian politics.

History of Stormy Relations

In Saddam Hussein’s time, members of Iraq’s Sunni Muslim minority dominated the Baghdad government and armed forces. The Saudis consider themselves the leaders of Sunni Islam worldwide, but they regarded Saddam Hussein as a menace and stayed clear of him for years after Operation Desert Storm in 1991. The ouster of Saddam Hussein only exacerbated the estrangement because it brought to power a new regime dominated by Shia Muslims and backed by Shiite Iran, Saudi Arabia’s great rival for regional influence and power.

Nominal diplomatic relations resumed a few years ago. Saudi Arabia appointed an ambassador, but he lived in Amman and rarely visited Baghdad, where there was no Saudi embassy. The late King Abdullah loathed Iraq’s Shiite prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, whom he viewed as a stooge of Iran and a liar who had falsely promised him that he would run an inclusive government and treat the Sunni population fairly. Maliki did exactly the opposite, marginalizing the Sunnis in political, economic and military affairs. The Saudis accused him of fomenting the sectarian strife that has overrun the region and precipitating the rise of the Islamic State (ISIS or IS), a Sunni extremist group that Saudi Arabia sees as a direct threat.

The result was that Saudi Arabia, against the advice of the United States, forfeited nearly all influence in Iraq, leaving a vacuum of diplomacy and economic investment that Iraq was happy to fill. Not only did Riyadh shun Maliki’s Iraq, it built a long security fence to seal the desert border.

These tensions began to ease last year when Haider al-Abadi replaced Maliki as prime minister. The fact that Abadi, like Maliki, is a Shiite—a subgroup within Islam that Saudis generally scorn–did not automatically preclude Saudi support. When Maliki ran for a second term in 2010, Saudi Arabia supported a Shiite rival, former premier Iyad Allawi. From Riyadh’s perspective, Abadi was entitled to the benefit of the doubt in Riyadh simply because he was not Maliki.

When Abadi’s selection was announced, King Abdullah promptly sent a congratulatory message saying he “prayed to God Almighty to grant him success in restoring cohesion among the Iraqi people, preserving the unity of Iraq, and achieving security and stability in Iraq,” the official Saudi Press Agency reported. The Saudi foreign minister at the time, Prince Saud al-Faisal, said at a news conference that Abadi’s appointment was “good news.” Now rapprochement is a bit closer at hand.

Ambassadorial Signal

Not much about Gen. al-Sabhan is known to outsiders. Saudi military officers who are not princes of the ruling family generally avoid publicity. His previous assignment was military attaché in Beirut, indicating an intelligence background. He has not had any previous diplomatic post, which provoked some criticism of his appointment within Iraq.

One commentator, Salah al-Arbawi, called on the Iraqi government not to accept the appointment, complaining that the general “has never had any post in the Saudi foreign service and has no diplomatic experience. He’s just a military officer.” Such comments have apparently had little effect.

Obviously one royal appointment to a single post will have little immediate impact on the region’s sectarian wars. Even as al-Sabhan prepares to take up his post, Saudi warplanes are striking positions in Yemen held by Shiite rebels there known as Houthis, and Iraqi Shiite militias are fighting Sunni elements of IS in Iraq. But any good news is welcome in that part of the world, and it could indicate that Saudi Arabia and Iraq, both under new leaders since last summer, will find ways to be helpful to each other for a change.

Madawi al-Rasheed, a dissident Saudi academic who lives in Britain, noted in Al Monitor that the Saudis need to do more than send an ambassador—they have to recognize that Iraq’s Shiites are not just some indistinguishable bloc of hostile rivals whose political ascendancy is illegitimate. If Saudi Arabia wants to help the Sunni people of Iraq, she wrote, it can best serve their real interest by engaging those multiple voices on the other side of the Iraqi divide. Its policy in Iraq should seek a modus operandi with the Iraqi government and reach out to other Shiite voices in Iraq who have had a long history of calling for an end to the sectarian policies of the post-2003 Iraqi governments.” Perhaps the new government in Riyadh under King Salman—which seems to be sincere in its pledge to stamp out sectarian violence against its own Shiite minority—can rise to the occasion.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


One Response to A Tiny But Positive Step in the Middle East

Show Comments >



  1. avatar Virgile says:

    I undesrstans that there are no Saudi Shias in the Saudi establishment, while Saudi Shias make 10% of the population and are situated in one of the richest part of the country.
    As long as this is the case Saudis opening to the Shias in Iraq would always sound phony.


About the Author

avatar

Thomas W. Lippman is a Washington-based author and journalist who has written about Middle Eastern affairs and American foreign policy for more than four decades, specializing in Saudi Arabian affairs, U.S.- Saudi relations, and relations between the West and Islam. He is a former Middle East bureau chief of the Washington Post, and also served as that newspaper's oil and energy reporter. Throughout the 1990s, he covered foreign policy and national security for the Post, traveling frequently to Saudi Arabia and other countries in the Middle East. In 2003 he was the principal writer on the war in Iraq for Washingtonpost.com. Prior to his work in the Middle East, he covered the Vietnam war as the Washington Post's bureau chief in Saigon. Lippman has authored seven books about the Middle East and U.S. foreign policy. He is also an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, where he serves as the principal media contact on Saudi Arabia and U.S. – Saudi relations.



Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!