by Ellie Geranmayeh
Despite months of E3-US negotiations to avert an unnecessary crisis over the Iran nuclear deal, President Trump has declared a hard exit from the nuclear agreement. The decision demonstrates that the US has decided that confrontation with Iran is both necessary and inevitable, regardless of what European allies think. The US administration looks set to increase tensions with Tehran and promote an implosion of Iran’s economy in ways that significantly increase risks of greater military escalation in the Middle East. Moreover, in the coming weeks, United States looks set to lead an economic and political assault on European interests.
The E3 should now acknowledge that its negotiating tactic of accommodation and comprise with Trump has failed. If Europe is to have any influence forthcoming US policy on Iran, European governments should quickly shift tack, unifying behind a more assertive diplomatic strategy aimed at deterring the worst-case scenario of renewed Iranian nuclear program and more instability and violence in a region close to its borders.
European governments are clearly tempted to think that the delays in implementation of sanctions mean they still have time to persuade the US president to reverse course. But the US president has acted on his promise to fully withdraw from the deal. He is now supported in that view by key advisors who have long advocated a forceful stand against Iran, not just on the nuclear deal but also in terms of encouraging regime change in Iran. It should now be abundantly clear that the current US administration cannot be a partner in salvaging the deal.
In this context the EU and its member states should now prioritize the following action points:
- European leaders should use the forthcoming May 17 European Council meeting in Sofia to publicly and unanimously condemn the U.S. decision to withdraw from a multilateral global security arrangement and place the responsibility for any instability that results on the Trump administration.
- European leaders should reject further negotiation between the E3 and the US administration on a “broader framework” on Iran policy, including the prospect of further EU sanctions targeting Iran, until and unless the Trump administration makes significant adjustments to minimise the enforcement of US secondary sanctions targeting European companies doing business with Iran.
- European governments should prioritise measures aimed at maintaining Iranian adherence to the deal. The E3/EU should meet with Iranian counterparts at foreign ministerial level to agree on contingency plans. European governments should make a case to the Iranian government and public as to why the deal can be sustained and continue to serve Iran’s interest. This should emphasise the immediate economic benefits of continued oil exports (which Europe must vow to maintain as an priority). In this effort to entice Iran, Europe should cooperate with Russia and China, the other parties to the nuclear deal.
- Europe’s approach should include the formulation of clear legal conditions for strategic sectors of trade with Iran aimed at protecting key European commercial deals seen as barometers of nuclear deal’s success and its ongoing survival (namely in the energy domain, aviation and automotive industries). The E3/EU should prioritise securing exemptions and waivers from enforcement of US secondary sanctions for European energy companies and related financial services to allow continued oil imports from and payments to Iran. Towards this end, EU member states should begin consultations regarding counter-measures against the United States. This should include political and legal threats that the EU will consider reviving the EU Blocking Regulation and even impose new penalties against assets of US companies based in Europe to allow for “claw-back” of unfair and illegal fines imposed on European companies doing business with Iran. European leaders should press this issue very hard with the Trump administration, making clear that this is a critical issue for the transatlantic relationship, as well as ongoing cooperation on regional issues in the Middle East.
- European governments should also look to find bridging solutions to maintain banking connections with Iran even if at far reduced levels, including by temporarily connecting respective central banks in EU member states to the Central Bank of Iran and creating emergency exp0rt credit lines. The EU EAS should accelerate coordination among leading member states, their export credit agencies and state-owned banks to devise novel banking mechanisms allowing a degree of risk-sharing between governments and the financial sector on business with Iran. This effort should aim to facilitate a pan-European approach towards creating special purpose vehicles to finance sector-specific trade and investment with Iran. The EU EEAS should also advance existing proposals for the European Investment Bank to become a lending bank for long-term and medium-sized investments inside Iran.
- It will now be more critical than ever for Europeans to maintain a dialogue with Iran on regional and ballistic missile issues, given that the US exit from the nuclear deal is already feeding wider regional escalation. This is particularly true given that the Trump administration is likely to work with its key regional allies to accompany the nuclear agreement withdrawal with a wider push against Iran. Germany, France, the UK and Italy should accelerate and formalise recently launched regional talks with Iran, including efforts to advance de-escalation possibilities between Iran and Israel in Syria where the situation is becoming increasingly febrile.
In the end, Europe may not be capable of salvaging the nuclear deal. But if the Europeans want to promote non-proliferation in the region and reduce regional instability, they need to demonstrate to the Americans, the Iranians and others that they are willing to try. Allowing the collapse of the nuclear deal without a proper fight will have immediate and disastrous consequences in the Middle East, while also significantly reducing European relevance on global security. Europe faces a critical and historic choice and must demonstrate its political will to advance its security interests through robust diplomacy.
Republished, with permission, from the European Council on Foreign Affairs.
It would be nice to see reporting on what the EU is *likely* to do. Unquestionably, it wants to continue with the Iran deal. But will it? This is the ultimate test of whether the EU and UK are merely vassals of the US Empire. My guess is they *are* and will continue to be. (Debka BTW reports that the UK and France have been preparing forces on the quiet to support US/Israel action against Iran).
All commerce flows through the United States. Getting cut off from the United States is to be cut off from the world. The consent of feline Europeans is not required.
Very good suggestions Ms Geranmayeh! But it is wishful thinking that the EU could have a United front and or its stronger states namely E3 would sacrifice their own commercial interests with this crazy administration in US!
Iran has to learn to standing her ground without any help from anybody!
Iran specifically President Rouhani when he was the chief national security made a strategic mistake from the goodness of his heart to abandon the desire of going all the way with their nuclear program in 2003. Negotiating with the west is impossible from a weak position and NK is and will be a good example for the world to watch and learn!
Congratulations to Ellie Geranmayeh for this. Hopefully it is being read by senior officials throughout the European Union.
Point 1 is absolutely essential. Action must be taken at the level of Foreign Ministers of all EU countries. As a posted comment suggests, two of the E3 may be willing even to join the US in military action against Iran. The will of the whole of the EU must be expressed. In fact, an action Geranmayeh did not include would be a strong statement from the European Council that it will not join any military action initiated against Iran.
I am sorry but the EU is a paper tiger that exists solely to sustain its own hype. Since it does not pass the basic test (how many divisions does the EU command?) and since oil and world commerce is conducted in dollars, the EU in practice is the world’s largest protectorate of Washington, a modern incarnation of the Confederation of the Rhine. A lot of nice words will be employed to convince us otherwise, but the writing is on the wall for any one who cares to look.
Comments are closed.