Wiesenthal Center Determined to Go Down in Flames

Amid the array of hysterical reactions to President Obama’s Middle East speech — notable examples include Benjamin Netanyahu and Mitt Romney — one under-reported response came from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which blasted Obama for calling for Israel to return to the 1967 “Auschwitz borders”.

Referring to the 1967 lines as “Auschwitz borders” is an old rhetorical trope that dates back (in some form or other) to Abba Eban in the 1960s. The underlying thought is that Israel’s borders are “indefensible” (as Netanyahu suggested) without large chunks of the West Bank; this claim sits rather uneasily with the fact that Israel has in fact successfully defended the pre-1967 borders on multiple occasions, and that its military advantage over its neighbors has only increased since the Six-Day War. The “Auschwitz borders” line is merely a particularly rhetorically vile and emotionally manipulative way of stating this claim, with its implication that an end to the Israeli occupation would be in some way comparable to the Holocaust.

While the trope is noxious enough coming from your garden-variety Likudnik or American neocon, it is especially rich coming from the Wiesenthal Center, an organization whose mission includes “teach[ing] the lessons of the Holocaust for future generations” and which has taken a leading role in policing the bounds of discourse concerning the Holocaust. The latest Wiesenthal statement raises some salient questions for Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper, the center’s leaders. For instance: if fully ending the Israeli occupation would be a calamity comparable to Auschwitz, what other contemporary world events can legitimately be compared to Auschwitz? Is it permissible to compare, say, Guantanamo Bay to Auschwitz? Is it permissible to compare the Israeli blockade of Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto? Is it permissible to compare Operation Cast Lead to the Holocaust?

More importantly, who gets to decide what constitutes a legitimate or illegitimate appropriation of the Holocaust for political purposes? Is it only Rabbis Hier and Cooper? If so, by what authority? Was there some sort of election in which they were appointed official custodians of the memory of the Shoah? If so, why is there no record of it?

The Wiesenthal Center has already been in hot water for its plans to build a “Museum of Tolerance” in Jerusalem on the site of an old Muslim cemetery. This latest statement displays a similar tone-deafness, in ways rather similar to the Anti-Defamation League’s self-marginalizing attack on the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” last year. Given this record, one is forced to ask what purpose these Jewish civil rights groups are serving in this day and age. Both the Wiesenthal Center and the ADL seem to think that their mission is first and foremost to serve as enforcers of the Likud line in the international arena. If this is all they have to offer the world, perhaps they have outlived their usefulness.

Daniel Luban

Daniel Luban is a postdoctoral associate at Yale University. He holds a PhD in politics from the University of Chicago and was formerly a correspondent in the Washington bureau of Inter Press Service.

SHOW 6 COMMENTS

6 Comments

  1. Great comments from both Mr. Luban and the previous posters.
    This is understandably a touchy subject but frankly I’m fed up of the incessant Holocaustmania.
    This is one topic that I can’t discuss with my Jewish wife of 23 years and many others.
    But Mao killed 110 million Chinese in just 27 years,the Soviets killed 70-80 million in 71 years
    and Ho killed millions in Vietnam as did the US too, Kim killed millions in Korea, Black Africans have killed 10-15 million of each other since 1994,
    Pol Pot killed half of Cambodia, 3 million, postwar
    Soviet governments in eastern Europe killed 2-3 million Sudenten Germans while expelling 15 million
    and the list goes on and on and on.
    The real holocaust was WW2 and the US-UK mass killing of millions in Germany and Japan.
    I don’t begrudge the Jews for whatever number were killed in Nazi Occupied, whether it was six million or 600,000. And why are revisionists going to prison for this dissent from official orthodoxy ? Nobody here in Berkeley goes to prison for denying Communist mass murders.
    It’s too late for two states.
    King Bibi treated Obama like a House Negro. Obama should have punched him out.

Comments are closed.