LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook











Stop Using “Woman in Chador Walks by Anti-US Mural” Stock Photo for Every Article About Iran

by Adam Johnson The general mindlessness in choosing a stock photo is what makes...

Message no image

Published on November 15th, 2009 | by Daniel Luban

3

Another Shoe Drops in the NIAC Story

By Daniel Luban

Following up on our coverage of the campaign to destroy the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC), Josh Rogin at the Cable has more information on the background to the attacks. The most interesting revelation concerns Hassan Daioleslam, the Iranian-American journalist — accused by critics of ties to the Mujaheden-e Khalq (MEK) terrorist group — who is being sued by NIAC for defamation and who appears to have been the source for the recent Washington Times hit piece on NIAC. Newly released documents make clear that Daioleslam (portrayed by his hawkish supporters as merely a concerned human rights and democracy advocate) has been only the public face of a group of Washington neoconservatives aiming to bring down NIAC as a way to undercut the Obama administration.

Rogin relays emails between Daioleslam and Kenneth Timmerman, in which the two plot strategy and discuss plans to leak documents to Times reporter Eli Lake. Timmerman, for those not familiar with him, is a notorious neoconservative hardliner and longtime advocate of regime change in Tehran. He founded the ultra-hawkish Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI) in 1995 with Joshua Muravchik and the late Peter Rodman, but became marginalized in mainstream circles after making a series of outlandish accusations. Notably, he accused Iran of having a role both in the September 11 attacks and the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings; he also alleged the existence of an “insurgency within the U.S. government” — a conspiracy centered on the CIA and State Department — that “sabotaged the [Bush] administration’s Iraq war plans” and was responsible for the failures of the U.S. war effort.

In one April 2008 email, Daioleslam wrote to Timmerman that he considered NIAC president Trita Parsi to be “the weakest part of the Iranian web” and that “destroying him will be the start of attacking the whole web.” Daioleslam continued (my emphasis): “This is an integral part of any attack on Clinton and Obama“. (The email was sent during the Democratic primaries, when it was not yet clear who would be the Democratic nominee.)

The email makes clear that the attacks on NIAC are simply a means to an end — the real goal being the sabotage of the Obama administration’s Iran policy. While it makes sense that the NIAC attacks have been picked up by the Weekly Standard set, one has to wonder whether the liberals who have aided and abetted them feel comfortable with participating in a campaign whose ultimate goal is to cripple a Democratic administration.

[Cross-posted at The Faster Times.]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


3 Responses to Another Shoe Drops in the NIAC Story

Show Comments >



  1. avatar Jon Harrison says:

    The level of intrigue is below old Washington standards, but notable nonetheless, particularly for those who fail to comprehend how much U.S. public opinion (and, sometimes, government policy) is shaped by forces the average citizen is largely unaware of.

    I was surprised to learn that recent polling shows increasing public support for military action against Iran, should the Iranians refuse to abandon their nuclear program. Given that the threat to the U.S. is all but nonexistant, and that deterrence is a proven alternative to war, this shows just how well those in the shadows have done their work. The Obama administration will never attack Iran, but if he’s out in 2012 and a hard line Republican gets in, a U.S. ( and joint Israeli?) strike could occur. That, in my opinion, given the military/economic/budgetary strains we are under, would spell finis d’Amerique — at least as the world’s power number one.

  2. avatar TutuG says:

    Those who wants to know what the Mujahiddin-e-Khalq believe these days, may find this interview with an ex-MEK member useful: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HE18Ak01.html

  3. avatar Jon Harrison says:

    Thanks, TutuG, for the link. But it seems the key point re the MEK is that it definitely does NOT present any kind of threat to the Iranian regime. It can be no more than the smallest bit player in any U.S.-Israeli machinations, even from the PR point of view.


About the Author

avatar

Daniel Luban is a postdoctoral associate at Yale University. He holds a PhD in politics from the University of Chicago and was formerly a correspondent in the Washington bureau of Inter Press Service.



Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!