LobeLog on Facebook   LobeLog on Facebook

Managing the Disruptive Aftermath of Somalia’s Worst Terror Attack

by International Crisis Group The devastating twin truck bombings in Somalia’s...

Message no image

Published on February 5th, 2011 | by Ali Gharib


Actual Expert: Iraq War Set Back Tunisia and Egypt

Via Matt Duss’s twitter, Shibley Tehlami, a real expert on the Arab World, batters the already bruised neocon revisionists:

When the Bush administration used the Iraq War as a vehicle to spread democratic change in the Middle East, anger with the United States on foreign policy issues — particularly Iraq and the Arab-Israeli conflict — and deep suspicion of U.S. intentions put the genuine democracy advocates in the region on the defensive. The outcome has been that, every year since the Iraq War began, polls of Arabs revealed their sense that the Middle East is even less democratic than before.

As we witness the remarkable and inspiring events in both Tunisia and Egypt, one has to wonder whether these events could have taken place even earlier had there not been the diversion of the Iraq War — and whether these upheavals might have swept away Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship without shots being fired from the outside.

Even in Iran, where there is obvious public opposition to the clerical regime, as indicated by the contestation over the 2009 presidential election, one wonders whether the Iranian people might succeed if the regime were robbed of its ability to point fingers at the West.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Responses to Actual Expert: Iraq War Set Back Tunisia and Egypt

Show Comments >

  1. avatar Jon Harrison says:

    Some expert. The appearance of American legions on Iraqi soil delayed democratic uprsings in Tunisia and Egypt? Democracy advocates were put “on the defensive”? Nonsense. Nobody took Bush’s pronouncements about democracy seriously to begin with. Any “delay” in Tunisia and Egypt was caused by the agents of repression in those two countries, or the loose bowels of the democracy advocates, or some combination of both.

  2. avatar scott says:

    He is both right and wrong in my opinion. In fact 9/11 and the twisting of the screws by the US security state did ratchet security up across the region. It also opened a spigot of money.

    That also drained our reserves and the riots we see today might have been treated differently had we been in fatter times. We might have upped food aid to these stressed populations, helping our puppets suppress dissent. But, we’re broke, NATO has been shredded, and they’re broke and less disposed to support military adventurism.

    No one has acutely put the problem on these concomitant factors, speculation fuels commodities spikes and a bankrupt West. Resource poor countries will fall, the rich will be able to ride this out.

About the Author


Ali Gharib is a New York-based journalist on U.S. foreign policy with a focus on the Middle East and Central Asia. His work has appeared at Inter Press Service, where he was the Deputy Washington Bureau Chief; the Buffalo Beast; Huffington Post; Mondoweiss; Right Web; and Alternet. He holds a Master's degree in Philosophy and Public Policy from the London School of Economics and Political Science. A proud Iranian-American and fluent Farsi speaker, Ali was born in California and raised in D.C.

Back to Top ↑
  • Named after veteran journalist Jim Lobe, LobeLog provides daily expert perspectives on US foreign policy toward the Middle East through investigative reports and analyses from Washington to Tehran and beyond. It became the first weblog to receive the Arthur Ross Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs from the American Academy of Diplomacy in 2015.

  • Categories

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular Posts

  • Comments Policy

    We value your opinion and encourage you to comment on our postings. To ensure a safe environment we will not publish comments that involve ad hominem attacks, racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory language, or anything that is written solely for the purpose of slandering a person or subject.

    Excessively long comments may not be published due to their length. All comments are moderated. LobeLog does not publish comments with links.

    Thanks for reading and we look forward to hearing from you!